04-10-2000 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION COUNCIL B.Adjacent property to the south is the Luce Line Trail and to the north is a developed residential property containing a wetland near the no^ boundary of applicants ’ property. The adjacent property is not available for purchase to increase the width of applicants ’ property at the 50 front setback line. C.The existing house on the property has existed there for many decades and is located less than the required 30’ from the side lot line adjacent to the Luce Line Trail. Applicants propose to remove that house and construct a new residence that meets all setback requirements of the City. D Strict enforcement of the zoning code would not allow the existing house with non-conforming setback to be replaced with a new house having conforming setbacks. 4.The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff. by the applont and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the commurit>'. 5.The City Council finds ihafthe conditions existmg on this property are pecuUar to it and do not applv generally to other property m this zonmg kismet, that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions light am nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property, wou serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of th Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council 10 Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23. Subdivision 5 (B) to existing residence and construction of a new residence on the property, su j = conditions: 1. The new residence shall meet all required setbacks Paae 2 of 5 I ¥»• — irjm