Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />February 27, 2023 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 21 of 22 <br /> <br /> <br />Edwards said it could be a standing Council agenda item, which would be setting the draft agenda, so to <br />speak for the upcoming work session or confirming it. He said for the next work session right now he has <br />nothing on that agenda. So you would say okay, we're going to cancel it. I think the only people that can <br />cancel it are the Council. <br /> <br />Benson said just to be clear it’s not that I directed Adam, because we already had that discussion. We all <br />were in agreement that no one person directs Adam or staff to change anything. So when the work session <br />was changed from 5 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. and I asked you, why is that and you said Mayor Walsh said it to <br />be so and I'm thinking well, that's something that the Council should discuss. It should not come from <br />either me, Councilmember Johnson. <br /> <br />Walsh said I like Matt’s idea that we just cancel all work sessions. And we put it either on the Council <br />itself, if we don't want to have it at the work session, or we have to approve any work session, the time <br />and the agenda at the Council to begin with. <br /> <br />Seals said for example, are we saying there'll be a standing item that would say next meetings work <br />session, and then if there was anything and then maybe we'd look at it and be like, okay, that's 30 minutes, <br />that's an hour, whatever that might be. The benefit of that, I guess, is this community gets a heads up <br />what's coming two weeks out. And control that we cancel all work sessions and we have to approve any <br />work session and the agenda at the previous meeting. <br /> <br />Benson said I'm not in favor of this. And I'll tell you why. It's because there's been accusations from <br />people showing up at these meetings, saying when are you deliberating when you make a decision? So I <br />do think that this discussion would be a great one to have in the next work session about work sessions. <br />Let's figure it out at a work session, because that's what work sessions are for is doing the business of the <br />City. I'm not in favor of this. And I don't think we should be taking a vote on this, if that's where this is <br />headed. I am not in any way approving of this. This was not on the agenda. This is done after our closed <br />session. And while we've reopened the meeting, I am not in favor of this. <br /> <br />Mattick said if I could just weigh in on it a little bit, this is a regularly-scheduled meeting. So you can add <br />items to be discussed. The way it traditionally works is you, at the beginning of the year, you post your <br />regularly-scheduled meetings like tonight's meeting, and you have the flexibility then at a regular meeting <br />to either add to the agenda, take off the agenda, do those sorts of things. If you cancel all of your work <br />sessions, those are still a meeting subject to the Open Meeting Law. And so if I understand what's being <br />proposed is like, tonight, we'd have an agenda item, next work session, that then becomes a special <br />meeting because you have no scheduled work sessions. So at that point, the one drawback is that you are <br />limited to whatever that agenda is posted as -- you cannot add other items. And maybe that's not a <br />drawback, but that is something I'd like you to be aware of. <br /> <br />Seals asked could you leave the work sessions on the calendar? And then at the meeting prior to the next <br />one, you discuss the work session topic, so they're all scheduled. So instead of adding the canceled one <br />back in, you would have a discussion two weeks prior saying we have this work session scheduled. <br />Adam, what are the topics? And if Adam says there's nothing and we say there's nothing then you could <br />cancel.