Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> JANUARY 23, 2023 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 2 of 12 <br /> <br />pretty big issues with it starting with, there was no record of the discussion with the city attorney and <br />myself regarding my request to abstain from the vote on the refurbishing of the fire truck. That whole <br />section was not there. There are several other sections related to fire where details are lacking. So I'd like <br />to understand more about how we can either send these notes back whether it's me making a motion to do <br />so or whatnot, because it's really not an accurate representation of the meeting. <br /> <br />City Administrator/Engineer Edwards said the City can send the minutes back to the contractor who <br />prepares them and then bring an amended set back to the council the next meeting. <br /> <br />Walsh responded that we'll just leave the minutes off for the time being and we'll just table it. <br /> <br />Edwards clarified the council can table it or direct staff to send it back to the contractor. <br /> <br />Walsh directed staff to send the minutes back and then bring them back and make sure they are correct. <br /> <br />9. APPROVAL TO ACCEPT TRANSFER OF PROPERTY – RESOLUTION NO. 7335 <br />Jane Delaney, 1315 Woodhill Avenue, said her question was curiosity on her part. How does that work? <br />Has the property already been paid for? Or was it paid for when it was bought? <br /> <br />Walsh said he believes that when the City did the agreement a long time ago that it paid for it and this is <br />just the transfer of title. <br /> <br />City Attorney Mattick said the Council at the time had been interested in pursuing this parcel for a while <br />so they did buy it from the property owner who by my recollection was still living there. They reserved <br />for themselves what's called a life estate, meaning that the city went ahead and paid for that property, but <br />they got to stay there for in essence, the remainder of their life and or until they moved away from the <br />property. Their attorney did contact me and said they're moving so pursuant to the agreement that had <br />been negotiated a while ago, then what remains of that property gets transferred to the city so that it's <br />totally the city's at this point. <br /> <br />Ms. Delaney asked what Mattick meant by what remains of it. <br /> <br />Mattick said they reserved for themselves what's referred to as a life estate which is the ability to stay in <br />that property as long as they lived, or until they moved which is what was negotiated. So they still have <br />that right. <br /> <br />Walsh stated, we don't owe them any money at this point. They just ended their rights basically. And so <br />now the transfer was fully done by accepting this and then it'll be back in the Parks hands to say let's see <br />what we need to master plan this whole fabulous park to suit what we're going to do now to put it all <br />together. <br /> <br />Seals moved, Crosby seconded to adopt Resolution No. 7335 Transfer of Property. VOTE: Ayes 5, <br />Nays 0. <br />