Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />DECEMBER 12, 2022 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 10 of 14 <br /> <br /> <br />Daniel Iverson, 4640 North Arm Drive, does not live near the property but wonders why consistently the <br />City Council seems to ignore engineer and DNR recommendations and dismiss that as routine. Is the <br />DNR lacking in intelligence or expertise that they do not need to be listened to? Is public comment <br />unnecessary and does not need to be listened to? He thinks comments made about propriety are justified, <br />it does not look right, and leaves suspicion of the City government. They may be well-advised to proceed <br />with caution and consideration for the rest of the people in the City. He was impressed with the City <br />budget noting Finance Director Olson knows what he is doing. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson, Applicant, received an email from a resident who was against this and they had a phone <br />conversation about the process and what Mr. Johnson is trying to do. After talking, the man sent an email <br />in favor of what Mr. Johnson is trying to do. The application has been interesting as these people will be <br />his neighbors, and after learning about a neighborhood meeting he said he would come and share his <br />knowledge, and they said Mr. Johnson was not welcome. He called multiple people with the offer to talk <br />to them so they could learn more about it and they do not return his call. Then he hears stories that he is <br />trying to extend the property from North Branch Road noting he is trying to vacate the road so a road does <br />not go through there and Mr. Johnson is trying to prevent future development through there. It would <br />make zero sense. Mr. Johnson is not offering to sell these to anyone, this is for his use, and the most fair <br />and honest thing he heard tonight was that this is a piece of private property, not a park. People might <br />want to know what he is doing, and Mr. Johnson is curious about what Igor is doing as he has been <br />building a house for a long time, but Mr. Johnson does not have a right to know what Igor is doing inside <br />his house. Mr. Johnson is a pro-property rights person and has extended that to every resident that has <br />come before the City Council and he wants it extended to him because he is a resident. The idea that he <br />should be penalized because he is an elected official is a foreign concept. He appreciates that people want <br />to make sure he is not getting a privilege that someone else is not and he respects that. That can be <br />answered by the 2018 application that did occur, Mr. Johnson wasn’t a part of it, and the City Council <br />was in agreement with the vacation because it is reasonable, it is consistent with the past whether the <br />1960s, 1970s, 1980s, or even the past couple of years around this neighborhood. He understands that <br />people might like the open space they have enjoyed when the Morgarts owned it. At the same time this is <br />zoned for a use. Mr. Johnson addressed the question regarding if this is vacated why is it going to him and <br />noted this property has three PIDs, and right now it is allowed to have three different properties on it. All <br />the vacations that have occurred have already been given to the plots of land around this property. The <br />only vacations left are for Mr. Johnson’s plot of land and the City does not dictate where the vacated <br />property goes, rather it is the County and asked the City Attorney for comment. <br /> <br />Attorney Mattick replied in the affirmative. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson stated the City of Orono is not dictating that he gets it, rather it is through the County. He <br />noted this is a vacation to impede future development, not to enhance it as he heard tonight. <br /> <br />Ms. Hamblin appreciates what Mr. Johnson says about owning the land and can do what he wants with <br />the land as they all have that right. As a populace, they have not heard exactly what the plan for the land <br />is, they have heard a lot of rumors, she has a neighbor who was contacted about the potential of a road <br />going in next to her property to access Hattie Lane across the marsh. These are not rumors, these are facts,