Laserfiche WebLink
:E':-0?-l?rf 115 26 COnTUeiTAL FPOFEPTr-12473I7C0 P.02 O' <br />1 V'-STAL <br />* Inc. <br />December 7,1999 <br />Mr. Paul Weinberger <br />City of Oiono <br />2750 Kelley Parkway <br />P.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 <br />Re: Application of Bradley A. Hoyt <br />No. 2540 <br />Dear Mr. Weinberger <br />This letter concerns the planning application of Bradley A. Ho>1 <br />for an afler-the-fact conditional use permit and variances for his property <br />located at 2523 Kelly Avenue. <br />As you arc aware, the Planning Commission voted to recommend <br />denial of Mr. Hoyt’s application for an afler-the-fact conditional use <br />permit. The Plaiming Commission, on the recommendation of statf and <br />despite the request o'f Mr. Hoyt’s representatives, refused to consider Mr. <br />Hoyt’s application for certain variances. <br />« <br />At the Planning Commission, the record 'vill reflect the follovring: <br />1. It was the City that identified the ncc essar>' after-the-fact <br />permits required upon inquiry from Mr. Ho>1. <br />2. An applicatior w .-.-, t ?o Mr. Hoyt by yourself and <br />marked as to the type of permit - *-*o by die application. A variance <br />was not indicated as required. <br />“3. A letter dated October 8,1999, from yourself in response <br />to Mr. Hoyt’s application identified certain items necessary for <br />consideration of the CUP and the variances. This information was either <br />provided in a timely manner or not available. <br />4. Per your own admission, the public notice for the <br />• application included the CUP and variances, and no additional <br />information to what was provided by Mr. Ho>t would be necessary to <br />consider any variances as part of the application. <br />hi?. 47; I7«X) <br />X(N» T>l-Ih-*,S <br />foli 47 00 I- <br />253 Easr lake Screec, Wayzau, Nliiioesoca 55391