Laserfiche WebLink
10. The City Council reviewed the application on December 13, 1999 and voted to <br />continue the application to a future meeting of the City Council. Staff delivered a <br />letter to the applicant requesting additional information as follows: <br />A. Completed variance application form, including statement of <br />hardship/unusual property' conditions, etc. <br />B. Name/address of any landscape designer who may have been involved in <br />designing the improvements. Name/address of contractor who completed the <br />work. <br />C. <br />D. <br />E. <br />F. <br />The plans given to the contractor defining what work was intended, such as <br />existing and proposed contours; retaining wall specifications; engineering <br />calculations on any segments of wall in excess of 48" in height; any pre­ <br />construction surveys you may have available; cut and fill calculations <br />indicating the volume, in cubic yards, of material proposed to be moved on <br />the property, etc. <br />Any as-built specifications provided by the contractor, especially if the final <br />result was different than the proposed plan. We do have your post­ <br />construction survey on file as submitted. <br />Any photographs or other documentation of the condition of the shoreline <br />prior to construction of the walls, especially any tree damage, or any <br />documentation from any tree service which may have removed storm- <br />damaged trees. <br />Any additional information which you believe will enhance the City’s <br />understanding of what work was completed and the reasons it was <br />undertaken. <br />11. The Planning Commission met for the purposes of holding a public hearing on <br />January 19,2000. Neither the applicant, nor anyone on his behalf was present at the <br />meeting. The Planning Commission voted to recommend denial and referred the <br />matter to the Citv Council. <br />Page 4 of 11