My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-13-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
03-13-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2023 4:26:30 PM
Creation date
3/9/2023 4:23:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4. <br />5. <br />D.The lot has a very limited building pad. Any new construction on the <br />property would require setback variances. Because Rest Point Road is <br />narrow it is not possible to park cars on the street without causing a <br />public safety issue. Each lot along Rest Point Road will require off <br />street parking areas to accommodate quests. The City Code requires all <br />garages with doors facing a street to be located 30 feet from the property <br />line to allow off street parking, thus requiring the house to be located <br />further from the property line. <br />E.A condition of approval is the applicants shall combine the two separate <br />tax parcels. The combination is required to allow the proposed <br />development to meet the approved .structural coverage and to permit the <br />additional hardcover, and the proposed house is located on the existing <br />property line. No structures are permitted to be located on a property <br />line. This condition shall be met prior to the issuance of a building <br />permit. <br />F.The applicants have agreed to grant an utility easement over the portion <br />of the property that contains the lift station. The lift station was <br />constructed in the 1970s without an easement ever being recorded. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br />granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br />serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br />property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br />by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br />welfare of the community. <br />Page 3 of 7
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.