My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-28-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
02-28-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2023 4:25:07 PM
Creation date
3/9/2023 4:22:10 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
254
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JUtV 19,1999- <br />v).^___>^cc'0 <br />be expanded to a full two story house under this proposal. <br />Bottenberg stated the Applicants are requesting approval of variances for lot coverage, <br />hardcover in the 0-75 and 75-250* setback area, lakeshore setback, and side yard setback. <br />The Applicants are proposing to decrease hardcover in the 0-75* setback to 45 square feet, <br />and increasing the amount of hardcover in the 75-250 ’ setback to 45.1 percent. Bottenberg <br />noted the overall structural coverage on this lot with this proposal will be 19.3 percent. <br />Bottenberg stated the existing residence was built in the 1960s, creating the existing side <br />yard setbacks. <br />City Staff is recommending reconfiguring the lakeside deck and keeping it at its present <br />size of 285 square feet, which will eliminate the hardcover variance and encroachment into <br />the 0-75* setback area. Staff also recommends leaving the sidewalk and driveway as is to <br />allow for off street parking and a turn-around. Bottenberg stated the proposed side entrance <br />is reasonable in size and is not excessive for the lot or size house. <br />Bottenberg staled i f the second story walls were to meet the 10 foot setback from the <br />north lot line, this would create odd shaped rooms and cause problems with the layout of <br />the second story. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Hawn commented when she visited the site, the residence was already under construction <br />and she was puzzled by what was new construction and what was existing. Hawn inquired <br />why construction had commenced prior to the application being heard by the Planning <br />Commission. <br />Berkman stated he has spoken with the City’s building inspector regarding this proposal. <br />The construction that is presently undeiway is outside the sideyard setback and a <br />building permit was issued to allow commencement Oi’ that work. Berkman stated the <br />property owners would like to have the work completed by April. Berkman stated the new <br />construction Is over the existing foundation, and the work requiring variances has not been <br />Page 43
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.