My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-14-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
02-14-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2023 4:25:09 PM
Creation date
3/9/2023 4:21:19 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
382
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MONDAY, NOVEMBER 15,1999 <br />(#2530 William Wear, Continued) <br />Nygard pointed out that some of the existing signs are oversized. <br />Downy stated to their knowledge they have removed all the signs that were non-conforming. <br />Smith commented if the 288 is reduced to 124, the total is 309 square feet. Smith Inquired whether <br />that number would be accurate for the total signage. <br />Downy stated there is 180 square feet allowed on the building, with 141 square feet of signage on <br />the west pylon sign, and the proposed 59 square feet of signage would bring It to a total of 380 <br />square feet. <br />Lindquist noted that the Planning Commission Is probably only going to approve up to 380 square <br />feet of signage. <br />Downy acknowledged that this sign plan does not allow for much additional signage for any new <br />tenants. <br />Weinberger pointed out that the 180 square feet and the 124 square feet that currently is on the <br />building would also consist of 40 square feet on the canopy. <br />Lindquist inquired whether the west pylon sign would be relocated <br />Downy stated the west pylon sign currently has signs in it. <br />Weinberger stated that the sign located under the power poles is being replaced with the Conoco <br />sign. Staff does have a concern if the total number of tenants drops below six, the west pylon sign <br />would contain less signs that what is currently allowed. The owner has indicated that the west <br />pylon sign would remain as it currently exists. However, the west pylon sign Is a non-conforrning <br />structure and would require that any proposed changes to the sign would require Council review. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Smith commented that a site plan is also requested as part of this application. <br />Weinberger stated that the new sign would be required to meet the ten foot front yard setback and <br />15 foot side yard setback, and City Staff would like to have a site plan submitted showing the <br />proposed location of the sign. <br />Chair Hawn noted that William Wear, Applicant, is now present. <br />Weinberger commented that Items A, B, and C were what was previously approved per Resolution <br />No. 2073. The Applicant is now requesting 180 square feet of building signage, 59 square feet for <br />the new Conoco sign, and 141 square feet for the existing pylon sign, for a total of 380 square feet. <br />Lindquist moved, Kluth seconded, to recommend approval of Applicant #2530, <br />William Wear, 2160 Wayzata Boulevard, granting of variances based on the signage <br />proposed, with a maximum of 380 square feet of signage being allowed for this property, with <br />the understanding that the Applicant will submit a site plan illustrating the location of the <br />proposed monument sign, and with the further understanding that the east pylon sign will <br />be removed. VOTE; Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />Page 3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.