My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-14-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
02-14-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2023 4:25:09 PM
Creation date
3/9/2023 4:21:19 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
382
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR <br />Smith commented the only way to create lots of one acre or more was to reduce the number of <br />lots from four to three. <br />Weinberger inquired whether the iand area calculations were determined by a surveyor. <br />Berg indicated they were, with the revised calculations indicating 13.7 acres dry buildable. <br />Weinberger stated the new numbers under a standard plat or PRD must meet ail the minimum <br />lot size requirements, with 13.7 acr - jry buildable meaning the developer may have six lots <br />in this subdivision. <br />Berg stated this subdivision surpasses the City's ordinances for a standard sewered lot Berg <br />pointed out they are only three-tenths of an acre less than 14 acres dry buildable. Berg <br />stated one area within this subdivision was artificially lowered a number of years ago, which <br />may not become flooded. <br />Stoddard stated it would still be defined as a wetland. <br />Van Eeckhout commented part of the wetland is located above the 100 year floodplain and <br />would In all likelihood never be wet Van Eeckhout stated in his opinion this area would not <br />have needed to be included in the wetland calculations. <br />Stoddard stated the Planning Commission reviews these applications based upon the <br />information that is submitted by the Applicant. Stoddard commented at the previous meeting <br />the Planning Commission had focused on the size of the lots and had requested the developer <br />look at increasing the tot size as much as possible. <br />Kluth commented he likes the bigger lots in the northeast comer. <br />Van Eeckhout stated in his view this is a good plan, and requested the Planning Commission <br />act on his application. <br />Hawn requested the Applicant address the issue of access. <br />Van Eeckhout staled he has paid Mr. Dunn three times lor the same easement Van Eeckhout <br />stated he has had an attorney review this easement as well as his title insura "ce company, <br />who have both assured him that he is legally entitled to construct a road over this easement to <br />Page 15
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.