My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-24-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
01-24-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2023 4:21:12 PM
Creation date
3/9/2023 4:18:44 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
233
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JANUARY 10,2000 <br />(#5A) SEWER ASSESSMENT/COST ALLOCA TION POLICY - Continued <br />Also, where there is not a significant threat to public health, a sewer project should only be built <br />if the property owners believe the full per unit cost of the project is equal to the per unit benefit <br />of the project. <br />Peterson said she concurs with staff s recommendation regarding the City ’s Sewer Assessment <br />Policy. <br />Kelley said he concurs with part of the staff recommendation. He said he is in favor of the City <br />funding the trunk line costs, and all properties pay the trunk costs as a connection charge when <br />they connect to the trunk line. <br />Jabbour said he likes the current policy. He feels the residents of Fox Hill may have been lead to <br />believe that the City will pay $60,000 of that project, but that is not true. He suggested the <br />Council vote on the policy as it exists and direct staff to prepare a 20 or 50 year plan identifying <br />some very major trunk lines, not smaller lines through neighborhoods. <br />Moorse said that when other cities do a trunk line and they identify how their city is going to <br />develop, they know that ever>’ house that develops in their city will have sewer. In Orono, there <br />are many properties that currently have a septic system and an alternate site, so they may never <br />hook up to the sewer system. <br />Kelley said the City needs a 20 or 30-year plan showing where the trunk lines should be located. <br />Flint said the City is planning a lot of sewer lines that are caused by the new rules that were <br />adopted with the 3-foot separation. With the way the State and the County are changing tht rules <br />all the time, he doesn’t know which set of rules the City should plan under. Orono ’s policy has <br />been to go slow on sewers. If the City puts in some major trunk lines and has that kind of money <br />tied up in them, the City will be changing its basic policy. <br />Kelley said he concurs with Jabbour. He believes the State and County will get even more <br />restrictive in the future, not less restrictive, about on-site septic. He feels that part of the City ’s <br />policy should be a plan for 20 or 30 years down the road. He reviewed the areas that are now in <br />the MUSA line. <br />Jabbour said he just feels the Council left the citizens with the WTong impression. He said a two- <br />inch force main is not a trunk line. <br />Flint asked if Jabbour wants to see a plan that shows where trunk lines should be located only in <br />the areas that the City knows will have to have sewer in the future. <br />Jabbour said that is correct. <br />Page 14
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.