My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-10-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
01-10-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2023 4:20:42 PM
Creation date
3/9/2023 4:18:22 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Request for Council Action continued <br />Page 2 <br />Januar> 5. 2000 <br />Sewer Assessment/Cost Allocation Policv <br />Most recently, the Fox Ridge neighborhood has asked whether the City would finance a portion of <br />the costs of the *‘trunk” portion of the sewer project, since the trunk line may serve additional <br />properties in the future, which could then pay a trunk fee as reimbursement of the City ’s up-front <br />costs. The issue of funding the "trunk” portion of a sewer project differently or separately from the <br />remainder of a project is related to, but separate from, the assessment policy issue. The trunk <br />fundin'! issue w ill be addressed later in this memo. <br />Staff Recommendation Regarding the Cit> *s Sewer Assessment Policy <br />It is statT s recommendation that the City ’s assessment policy should continue to be that assessments <br />are based on the benefit to the property. Also, where there is not a significant threat to public health, <br />a sewer project should only be built if the property owners believe the full per unit cost of the project <br />is equal to the per unit benefit of the project. <br />With the completion of the Webber Hills project (planned for 2000). the City will have sewered all <br />neighborhoods with density greater than two acres, and most neighborhoods relatively close to an <br />existing sewer line. If the City continues to extend sewer to developed neighborhoods, the cost of <br />the projects will increase substantially. This is due to the need to build more sewer line to connect <br />a neighborhood to an existing sewer line, and due to the need to build more sewer line per property <br />to ser\ e neighborhoods developed at two acre density. With these higher costs and the availability <br />of alternate septic sites on existing tw o acre development, it becomes e\ en more important that a <br />sewer project not move ahead unless the property owners believe the full per unit cost of the project <br />is equal to the per unit benefit of the project, and are willing to pay that full cost. <br />Sewer Trunk Options <br />As the City continues to extend sewer, it is moving from neighborhoods that are adjacent to an <br />existing sewer line to neighborhoods that are farther and farther from an existing sewer line. This <br />causes the cost of a sewer project to increase significantly if the neighborhood to be served pays the <br />full cost of the trunk line. <br />A sewer trunk line by definition is a line that has the ability to serve other properties or <br />neighborhoods it passes in addition to the speeific neighborhood that initiates the sewer project. The <br />problem is that the other properties and neighborhoods passed by the trunk line may or may not need <br />or want sewer at the time the trunk line is installed. <br />There are three options for funding a trunk sewer line. <br />A.The specific neighborhood that initiates the project pays the full cost as part of the <br />project assessments. <br />1 <br />( <br />■; <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.