1991-06-27 On Site Sewage Treatment Inspection Report

Home Browse Search

On rbr• A'orlib Sbare of take Stinnetonkir ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT INSPECTION REPORT POST OFFICE BOX 66 1335 S. Brown Rd. Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 OWNER &10141 T LI1% --- PERMIT NO.'S. 11 -r -e DATES c �-- ADDRESS CONTRACTORS City Ordinance No, 210 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono he inspected on a regular baso. The on-site sis op treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below [Thisis it an existing system ❑ new const.u;tion) Q/ Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects rely ing to design, construction, and location. Appears to tie operating properly. 2 Does not meet all current City standards lot new construction 11978 Codel but in most respects appears to be designed located, and constructed generally in accordance with previous codes. System appears to be functionrn9 properly: no major upgrading of the system is requirec; at this tutu. Q3 Does not meet current City standards in many respects relating to design, contiructron, or location. Appears to be operating adequately at this time, but hat a relatively high potential for future problems. No major upgradinq of system is required at j this lime. 5 4 System may or may not meet current City ttandMdt la desigih, construction or location. but is failing to propetly treat and k(� dispose of the may input, and is endangering a water supply, or is a source of pollut-on to surface Of groundwater%, or is creating a safety horaid, or is otherwise creating a public nuisance. Please contact the City Inµiector to dHCuts system repairl replacement procedures. If rhainlield replacement is necessaty, sod tatting will usually tie requited, and a design and tate Wan must be submitted for review. Your contractor mutt obtain a permit before work is started. SYSTEM CONDITION 1 ® Checked items mev require your action) Tank inspection indicates Q Pumpoui not needed at this tome. IT}I Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pump - ad out this year to help prevent future problems. ❑ Solids accumulation in tanks is at a Lrttipl level. Tanks should be pumped out as soon as possible. Cl System is discharging to surface. Tanks must be pumped within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge. ❑ Inspection risers missing -tanks could not in inspected. Inspection nNrs (4" dace. pipe) must be inioWled in each lank at next pumpout. II tanks hoe not been pumped out within the last Mesa years, MeV should be pumped out now SITE CHARACTERISTICS Limiting Sore Factors ❑ Slope ❑ So l ❑ High water labie ❑ Lot sore ❑ Lake, wetland, or stream ❑ Drainage COMMENTS - -- Date of Inspection (-J Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle IDoes not give accurate measurement of solidi accumulation.) It tank - have not torn pumped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out no ov Drainfeeld inspection indicates ❑ Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident. ❑ Some "dance of surfacing, not critical yet. iA QLaintteld is saturated and visibly dtfictiorging untreated elflwl car cep, n con iUon may require r a mart ori ens io drrnlielld�, CCAMttait�-t —S Chi lris for �apattiatuat ba _� slain go dart. ❑ Drainfield extent and condition unknown. Potential for System Failure Site Capabilities for fdepen(h on sod types, water Future Expansion cable and system conrtitoon) ❑ Adequale .) LoveFair 1] Medium l J Poor % 14,901m O Inadequate vstem ars causing visible surface discharge �- - ptnc System Inspector Note In the event that this inspection report it used to satisfy the rlquuemrrno toe a mortgage or other transfer of peolierty, tie advised that this report doe, rut guarantee or certify that an emitting system will continue to function properly, but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on thr available rnlotmatton This rrpott mutt lit krill on the permiwe with %ysirrn location and pumping ircorth Will TF COPY I In%Iwctor'sFile GOLD COPY j tlrnnrownrr