Laserfiche WebLink
"1'elephone 4i3-7357 <br /> fe., <br /> .�xJ�.,� <br /> �-���� cITYo� o�o�To <br /> �,_ ��,��: <br /> �t: <br /> �r�.� <br /> ���h.,�z r;:; <br /> `��'; Pust Uffice 13oa (i(i•Crystal Bay, Minnesota 553`L3•Municipal Offices <br /> a On the North Shore of La{ze Minnetonka <br /> • ' f • <br /> May 16 , 1983 <br /> Nir . Roy E. Ahern <br /> 6449 Barrie Road <br /> Minneapolis , Minnesota 55435 <br /> _.., _. � <br /> Re : Big Island Record Lots �'15 #, <br /> ,,.. ..._.�,,.:,,.,.,.v.:.::.yx.:,�.�.,.w.� <br /> � <br /> Dear Mr . Ahern : <br /> Enclosed are separate information packets on your two Big Island <br /> lots and their status under the revised zoning ordinance adopted <br /> last December . <br /> I recommend that you consider completing and returning the variance <br /> resolution forms (#2) and the lot combination forms (#3 ) for both <br /> of your properties . Doing this will ensure that you receive the <br /> full grandfather benefits of the ordinance designed to protect <br /> building rights on those properties with existing cabins. <br /> � r_._�.._,.,+.,,� _�� <br /> � RECORD LOT #15,_, .. } <br /> �g�yv�1`" still have a problem with the record lot designation for <br /> Record Lot #15 , then you should not return the variance resolution , <br /> but should instead return the blue form (#1) and whatever other <br /> factual data you believe will support your challenge . <br /> I have talked to your realtor , Judy Frommes , concerning these <br /> properties and the City ' s position classifying these six lots as <br /> one building site . As I have said to her and previously to you, I <br /> believe you have the following options available : <br /> 1 . Accept the City designation and retain all six lots together as <br /> one building site . You could rebuild the existing cabin (? ) or <br /> more likely, replace it with a new cabin located either in the <br /> front or to the rear . In this case , I suggest you sign and return <br /> the variance resolution to guarantee the automatic/no fee variance . <br /> 2 . You could sell the back lots to another abutting property owner <br /> who could then combine them into his property without creating <br /> a new building site . In this case , to rebuild the cabin on the <br /> � front lot, you would have to formally apply for a change in the <br /> record lot designation and for a lot area variance , and perhaps for <br /> other variances. Such variances would most likely be approved but <br /> the burden would be on you to : <br />