Laserfiche WebLink
'1'ricphc�nc 473•7357 <br /> � ` <br /> �� `�� T T <br /> - CIT`� of OROl\ O <br /> 4* <br /> ' Pust Uffice liux (i(i•Crystal 13:�y, Minncsota 553'l:�•A1unicipal Offices <br /> E Lf O�i llie Nortlt Shore oj Lnl;e Min,ielo�ika <br /> , =; <br /> • - s c •: <br /> N;a}� 16 , 1983 <br /> ^4r . Roy E . Ahern <br /> 6499 Barrie Road <br /> N,inneapolis , rlinnesota 55435 <br /> ; _` � � ,� <br /> Re : Big Island ;�Record Lots n15 `& �5� <br /> �_.,......._.._...,....�.,.�..,.�._,...�.e ./ "W <br /> Dear Mr . Ahern : <br /> Enclosed are separate information packets on your two Big Island <br /> lots and their status under the revised zoning ordinance adopted <br /> last December . <br /> I recommend that you consider completing and returning the variance <br /> resolution forms (�2 ) and the lot combination forms (�3 ) for both <br /> of your properties . Doing this will ensure that you receive the <br /> full grandfather benefits of the ordinance designed to protec� <br /> building rights on those properties with eaisting cabins . <br /> ;" �' �� <br /> ;�ECORD LOT r15 � <br /> I��-you still have a problem with the record lot designation for <br /> Record Lot �15 , then you should not return the variance resolution , <br /> but should instead return the blue form (#1) and whatever other <br /> .f_actual data you believe will support your challenge . <br /> I have talked to your realtor , Judy Frommes , concerning these <br /> properties and the City ' s position classifying these six lots as ' <br /> one building site . As I have said to her and previously to you , I <br /> believe you have the following options available : <br /> 1. . Accept the City designation and retain all six lots together as <br /> one building site . You could rebuild the existing cabin (? ) or <br /> more likely , replace it with a new cabin located either in the <br /> front or to the rear . In this case , I suggest you sign and return <br /> , the variance resolution to guarantee the automatic/no fee variance . <br /> 2 . You could sell the back lots to another abutting property owner <br /> who could then combine them into his property without creating. <br /> a new building site . In this case , to rebuild the cabin on the <br /> • front lot, you would have �o formally apply for a change in the <br /> record lot designation and for a lot area variance , and perhaps for <br /> other variances . Such variances would most likely be approved but <br /> th� burden would be on you to : <br />