Minutes/notes re lot - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. / A�t MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL , DL:CEP-1BER 30 , :982 PAGE -2- , , , . � , . ; LphE ORDINANCE CON ' T, separated by a road riqht oE �,�ay identiEied by the � City of Orono as one building site , when in fact when purchased by Mr . Ahern were two different sites . For reasons I don ' t understartd , under your new ordinance , these were combined as one building site even though they were divided by a plated city street . It ap�eared the ordinance . intended to take ,all individual lots and cause them to be build_able with exception of the ones you t�lk about . Tn resoonse to that it would appear the ordinance would cause tnat a numb�r of lots woulc3 becorne only one lot . Roy sold the lots before this ordinance went into eFfect . The new copy of the ordin�nce shows y�u have r�ade changes , that chang�s tne time oF the o�aners of record For these lots , and it is that portion of t�e ordinance (the owne�s of record) �hat I would like to take this opportunity to object to . Can I ask why it was done? Mayor Van Nest then asked h1r . Olson �or the facts � on these lots . f�1r . Olson state<�3 the facts of the matter : ar� L':?�3t he h�s two separate holdings .The caay trie ordinanc�� is c��ritten . One is number �58 and that lot is aparoxi�ately . 32 acres , completely separate from the other holciings [�fr . Ahern had . Tnis was dec�ared buildable because it has a house on it . �econd oart is properties that we have combined as '�15 slightly r,orth of the first prope�ty (separated by ,John Dean ' s pro�erty) . Parcel � 15 combined on b��n sides of_ the right oF way to!�als ?. 1/2 acres . Neither piece is 2 acr�s by itself , and so under t��e current code , the 1974 code , it would be one sit�, or would nor_ be rebuildable . The cabin that is on that property is completely de�eriorated an,1 is in hazardoas condition at this point . Tnere was a permit IJJu�� at one time to rebuild it but was r.ever acted on , i � is not being used and is not nabitable at this tir;�e . Mr . Olson stated that he has tallced to ��r . ��hern and Mr . Creer on this matter in his o`fice . Mr . Roy Ahern stat�d that he had taken out tne huildinq permitandhad beendoing some remodeling in the cabin up until the time he sold the property. t�iayor Van Nest asked Mr . Ahern what had he sold , . and Mr . Ahern stated that he sold because of the ordinance bei.ng passed , and he was not going to be able to use any of that oropetty, he sold all of it . He stated he solc� a�1 of the parcels except for ��58 because I was not goir.g to be able to use any of the property the 41;3�/ I w��nted to under the ordinance .