Laserfiche WebLink
. / <br /> A�t MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL , DL:CEP-1BER 30 , :982 PAGE -2- <br /> , , , <br /> . � , <br /> . ; <br /> LphE ORDINANCE CON ' T, separated by a road riqht oE �,�ay identiEied by the <br /> � City of Orono as one building site , when in fact <br /> when purchased by Mr . Ahern were two different <br /> sites . For reasons I don ' t understartd , under <br /> your new ordinance , these were combined as one <br /> building site even though they were divided by a <br /> plated city street . It ap�eared the ordinance . <br /> intended to take ,all individual lots and cause <br /> them to be build_able with exception of the ones you <br /> t�lk about . Tn resoonse to that it would appear <br /> the ordinance would cause tnat a numb�r of lots <br /> woulc3 becorne only one lot . Roy sold the lots <br /> before this ordinance went into eFfect . The new <br /> copy of the ordin�nce shows y�u have r�ade changes , <br /> that chang�s tne time oF the o�aners of record For <br /> these lots , and it is that portion of t�e <br /> ordinance (the owne�s of record) �hat I would like <br /> to take this opportunity to object to . Can I ask <br /> why it was done? <br /> Mayor Van Nest then asked h1r . Olson �or the facts <br /> � on these lots . f�1r . Olson state<�3 the facts of the <br /> matter : ar� L':?�3t he h�s two separate <br /> holdings .The caay trie ordinanc�� is c��ritten . One is <br /> number �58 and that lot is aparoxi�ately . 32 <br /> acres , completely separate from the other <br /> holciings [�fr . Ahern had . Tnis was dec�ared <br /> buildable because it has a house on it . �econd <br /> oart is properties that we have combined as '�15 <br /> slightly r,orth of the first prope�ty (separated by <br /> ,John Dean ' s pro�erty) . Parcel � 15 combined on <br /> b��n sides of_ the right oF way to!�als ?. 1/2 acres . <br /> Neither piece is 2 acr�s by itself , and so under <br /> t��e current code , the 1974 code , it would be one <br /> sit�, or would nor_ be rebuildable . The cabin that <br /> is on that property is completely de�eriorated an,1 <br /> is in hazardoas condition at this point . Tnere <br /> was a permit IJJu�� at one time to rebuild it but <br /> was r.ever acted on , i � is not being used and is not <br /> nabitable at this tir;�e . Mr . Olson stated that he <br /> has tallced to ��r . ��hern and Mr . Creer on this <br /> matter in his o`fice . <br /> Mr . Roy Ahern stat�d that he had taken out tne <br /> huildinq permitandhad beendoing some remodeling <br /> in the cabin up until the time he sold the <br /> property. <br /> t�iayor Van Nest asked Mr . Ahern what had he sold , <br /> . and Mr . Ahern stated that he sold because of the <br /> ordinance bei.ng passed , and he was not going to be <br /> able to use any of that oropetty, he sold all of it . <br /> He stated he solc� a�1 of the parcels except for ��58 <br /> because I was not goir.g to be able to use any of the <br /> property the 41;3�/ I w��nted to under the ordinance . <br />