My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes/notes re lot
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Big Island
>
310 Big Island - PID: 23-117-23-32-0073
>
Correspondence
>
Minutes/notes re lot
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:13:45 PM
Creation date
9/24/2015 1:56:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
310
Street Name
Big Island
Address
310 Big Island
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
2311723320073
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. / <br /> A�t MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL , DL:CEP-1BER 30 , :982 PAGE -2- <br /> , , , <br /> . � , <br /> . ; <br /> LphE ORDINANCE CON ' T, separated by a road riqht oE �,�ay identiEied by the <br /> � City of Orono as one building site , when in fact <br /> when purchased by Mr . Ahern were two different <br /> sites . For reasons I don ' t understartd , under <br /> your new ordinance , these were combined as one <br /> building site even though they were divided by a <br /> plated city street . It ap�eared the ordinance . <br /> intended to take ,all individual lots and cause <br /> them to be build_able with exception of the ones you <br /> t�lk about . Tn resoonse to that it would appear <br /> the ordinance would cause tnat a numb�r of lots <br /> woulc3 becorne only one lot . Roy sold the lots <br /> before this ordinance went into eFfect . The new <br /> copy of the ordin�nce shows y�u have r�ade changes , <br /> that chang�s tne time oF the o�aners of record For <br /> these lots , and it is that portion of t�e <br /> ordinance (the owne�s of record) �hat I would like <br /> to take this opportunity to object to . Can I ask <br /> why it was done? <br /> Mayor Van Nest then asked h1r . Olson �or the facts <br /> � on these lots . f�1r . Olson state<�3 the facts of the <br /> matter : ar� L':?�3t he h�s two separate <br /> holdings .The caay trie ordinanc�� is c��ritten . One is <br /> number �58 and that lot is aparoxi�ately . 32 <br /> acres , completely separate from the other <br /> holciings [�fr . Ahern had . Tnis was dec�ared <br /> buildable because it has a house on it . �econd <br /> oart is properties that we have combined as '�15 <br /> slightly r,orth of the first prope�ty (separated by <br /> ,John Dean ' s pro�erty) . Parcel � 15 combined on <br /> b��n sides of_ the right oF way to!�als ?. 1/2 acres . <br /> Neither piece is 2 acr�s by itself , and so under <br /> t��e current code , the 1974 code , it would be one <br /> sit�, or would nor_ be rebuildable . The cabin that <br /> is on that property is completely de�eriorated an,1 <br /> is in hazardoas condition at this point . Tnere <br /> was a permit IJJu�� at one time to rebuild it but <br /> was r.ever acted on , i � is not being used and is not <br /> nabitable at this tir;�e . Mr . Olson stated that he <br /> has tallced to ��r . ��hern and Mr . Creer on this <br /> matter in his o`fice . <br /> Mr . Roy Ahern stat�d that he had taken out tne <br /> huildinq permitandhad beendoing some remodeling <br /> in the cabin up until the time he sold the <br /> property. <br /> t�iayor Van Nest asked Mr . Ahern what had he sold , <br /> . and Mr . Ahern stated that he sold because of the <br /> ordinance bei.ng passed , and he was not going to be <br /> able to use any of that oropetty, he sold all of it . <br /> He stated he solc� a�1 of the parcels except for ��58 <br /> because I was not goir.g to be able to use any of the <br /> property the 41;3�/ I w��nted to under the ordinance . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.