My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990-07-12 Memo, Alley Vacation Variance
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bayside Road - (AKA: Co. Rd. 84)
>
3770 Bayside Road - 05-117-23-24-0121
>
Land Use
>
1990-07-12 Memo, Alley Vacation Variance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:21:08 PM
Creation date
2/27/2023 11:05:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3770
Street Name
Bayside
Street Type
Road
Address
3770 Bayside Rd
Document Type
Land Use
PIN
0511723240121
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1536 <br />July 12, 1990 <br />Page 2 <br />alley. It is not clear from the letter whether the Harren's <br />are the official representative of the 4 property owners, <br />but they are certainly the most affected current resident <br />served by that road. <br />The applicant has approached the property owners surrounding <br />the alley, and the only response so far has been from the <br />Harren's, who suggest that until the alley is vacated, they have <br />no strong desire to discuss selling their half to the applicant. <br />This would appear to be somewhat counterproductive to the <br />Planning Commission's June 18th recommendation. <br />Discussion <br />Absent any expansion to create more bedrooms or bathrooms, <br />the revised proposal for remodeling, partial foundation <br />replacement, and roof line expansion, should have no impact on <br />the septic system, hence that issue is effectively eliminated. <br />The existing house location near the north and west lot <br />lines might be considered as a reasonable hardship to support a <br />recommendation for approval of the revised additions. with the <br />current property boundaries, applicant has no options available <br />which would avoid needing a setback variance. Planning <br />Commission must decide whether the revised proposal has a <br />significant visual impact on surrounding properties, or whether <br />other expansion options should be considered. <br />Regarding the application for vacation, the Harren's <br />petition suggests that if the alley is vacated, the portion <br />adjoining Landmark Drive becomes "part of a lot with lake <br />access". It would seem however that the west half of the alley <br />would be acquired by the Landmark homeowners as an addition to <br />the private road right-of-way, and (Outlot D), Outlot D is not a <br />buildable lot with lake access. The City would in no instance <br />consider that applicant's acquisition of the entire alley gives <br />him any lake access rights. Only Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 2, Block <br />2 of Bayside Landing, have lakeshore access over Outlot A. <br />The Harren petition leaves applicant one petitioner short of <br />the 3 petitioners necessary for proceeding with the vacation <br />request. Also, before the Harren's petition can be considered, <br />the City must be assured that the Harren's are the official <br />representative for the Landmark Homeowners Association (if one <br />exists). The Landmark Drive road outlot currently is listed in <br />Hennepin County property information records as being owned by <br />Austin and Diane Evans, the owners of vacant Lot 1, Block 1. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.