My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-19-2001 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2001
>
11-19-2001 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 2:32:40 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 2:31:02 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GITYofORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 4 5 R <br />5. <br />A. The lot is similar in design and dimension to all lots within the plat of <br />Orchard Park. <br />B.The property meets the minimum lot width standard for lots in the RR-IA <br />district. <br />C.The property does not have direct access to a developed public road. Access <br />to Orchard Park Road would be via a 33' wide platted right-of-way that was <br />dedicated within the plat of Orchard Park. <br />D.A lot combination has been completed on the lots located to the north of and <br />surrounding the subject property. The total land area of those lots is <br />approximately 23 acres (Lots 5,6,7,9,10 Orchard Park). The eastern lot, <br />located north of the subject propert>', does not have access to a public road. <br />The only potential access that exists is through the 33' right-of-way that is <br />proposed for vacation. <br />E.The plat of Jacobs Mill, completed in 1999, is east of the plat of Orchard <br />Park. No access to Jacobs Mill Road would be available due to a large <br />wetland located on Lot 6. <br />F.Two suitable septic site designs have been submitted by the applicants and <br />have been approved by the On-Site Systems Manager. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this propert>’ are peculiar to <br />it and do not apply generally to other property' in this zoning district; that granting <br />the variance to lot area will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose <br />a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely scr\e as a <br />convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship <br />or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and <br />would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and <br />Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />Page 2 of 5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.