Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MONDAY, OCTOBER IS. 2001 <br />(001-2728 WILLIAM AND LAURA STODDARD, CONTINUED) <br />GafTron stated the grading on the west-side of the property line will need to be reviewed in order to <br />determine whether the water runofT goes toward the lake. GafTron noted the drainage arrows on the <br />survey show that the drainage does not follow the natural flow to the lake. <br />Stoddard stated there is an easement in that area, with the elevations for the basement and first floor <br />being the same as the house to the east. <br />GafTron inquired where the neighbor’s house to the west lies in relation to Stoddard’s house. <br />Stoddard stated the house to the west is approximately five feet higher and that the drainage from his <br />lot would not run into the neighbor's house. <br />Hawn stated the question before the Planning Commission is whether the boathouse should be <br />included in the hardcover calculations. <br />Mabusth stated the Planning Commission should be consistent on this issue, and inquired whether the <br />current ordinance should be amended. <br />GafTron stated in his view the ordinance should be amended, and recommended discussing this item <br />in the upcoming work session. Gaffron stated this item needs to be formalized in the ordinance in <br />order for Staff to give f rm direction on the policies of the City. <br />Stoddard reiterated there have been examples where the boathouse was not included, citing a house <br />on Casco Point and another house down the road from his residence. <br />Lindquist stated in his opinion the 141 square feet should be removed. <br />Hawn stated the Planning Commission has gone both ways on this issue in the past, but <br />recommended that Stoddard consider reducing the hardcover by 141 square feet. <br />Kluth stated in his opinion if boathouses have not been included in the hardcover calculations in the <br />past, it has been a mistake on the part of the City. Kluth stated until the ordinance is changed. <br />Stoddard is probably entitled to the additional hardcover. <br />Hawn stated in her view the 141 square feet of additional hardcover should be removed even though <br />inclusion of boathouses in hardcover calculations have not been formalized by the City. <br />Stoddard pointed out that inclusion of boathouses in the hardcover calculations is not included in the <br />ordii:ance. <br />Rahn stated in his view the 141 square feet is relatively minor, and questioned whether there is <br />anyplace on the lot where the hardcover could be reduced further. <br />Stoddard stated one issue not before the Planning Commission tonight is the fact that a mistake has <br />been made on their title and that he actually has one extra foot on the east side. <br />Mabusth stated she would like the existing residence meet the 16-foot setback. <br />PAGE 27