My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-19-2001 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2001
>
11-19-2001 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 2:32:40 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 2:31:02 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MONDAY, OCTOBER 15,2001 <br />(#01-2722 MICHAEL AND MONICA BROWN, CONTINUED) <br />vehicle would not be able to park in the driveway without hanging out into the street. GafTron noted <br />the Code does require a SO-foot setback from the lot line. Another issue for consideration is whether <br />the City wants a structure that close to the street. <br />Hawn inquired w hether the members of the Planning Commission would like to see the size of the <br />garage reduced. <br />Mabusth and Kluth stated in their view the garage could perhaps be relocated somewhere else on the <br />property. <br />Rahn stated in his view the garage could perhaps be moved five feet closer to the house. <br />Brown stated he does not need to park in front of the garage since he has a parking area to the side of <br />the garage. Brown reiterated the other garages in the neighborhood face the street. <br />Rahn stated the issue for the Planning Commission is whether a hardship exists to grant the variance. <br />Hawn stated in her opinion the Applicant could design a garage that would avoid the need for a <br />setback variance, does not load from the street, and does not require two curb cuts. <br />Brown indicated he was not familiar with curb cuts prior to tonight's meeting. <br />Hawn inquired whether the Planning Commission had any issues with the fence replacement. <br />It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that they are in favor of a variance to permit <br />replacement of an existing fence. <br />Lindquist stated he is not in favor of the garage facing the street. <br />Brown stated he needs the Planning Commission to explain why they would approve a garage within <br />the last year for the mayor for the very same type of reasons. <br />Hawn indicated it was her understanding there were some issues dealing with setbacks in that file. <br />Gaffron stated he will check the file to see what the setback was from the street front line to the front <br />of the garage. <br />Brown staled one option would be to cut down the pine tree. <br />Hawn stated the Planning Commission is not asking the Applicant to remove the pine tree, <br />Brown stated he would prefer not to have to cut down the tree. <br />Rahn stated if the garage is located five feet closer to the house, a variance would not be required. <br />Brown stated it is his belief the pine tree is located more towards the middle of the garage than the <br />street. Brown stated in his view his request is reasonable. <br />PAGE 14
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.