Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MONDAY, OCTOBER 15,2001 <br />(MH-2689 MANDEEP SODHI, CONTINUED) <br />after-the-fact variance and conditional use permit. Staff had concerns at the time the permit was <br />issued that erosion could occur due to the vegetation removal and amount of e.xposed dirt in the area. <br />W«*inberger stated the Planning Commission should also review the vegetation replacement plan. <br />The Applicant removed a significant amount of the undergrowth on the hillside as well as two large <br />and several small trees that were removed. <br />Weinberger staled following issuance of the permit to complete the stairw ay, the contractor for the <br />property owner requested a land alteration permit in order to install a retaining wall, with the <br />elevation of the land being raised in one area to create a Hat walkout area. <br />Staffdiscovered in reviewing this application that the putting green was constructed two to three feet <br />above the e.\isting grade. Staff also discovered that the permit issued as part of the putting green <br />project allowed the putting green to encroach about eight feet into the bluff impact zone. An <br />after-the-fact variance would be required in this case for the putting green to permit fill to be <br />deposited in the bluff impact zone. Weinberger stated the propert> ow ner did have the appropriate <br />permits for all the work that occurred from the bluff line back, and only became an issue when <br />reviewing the application for the other permits. <br />The Planning Commission will need to consider whether the after-the-fact variance should be <br />approved, with City Code permitting one stairway down to the shoreline. Weinberger stated the <br />retaining wall constitutes hardcover within the 0-75 foot setback as well as structure within the bluff <br />line. <br />Weinberger stated he did visit the site again today and noticed that wood chips have been <br />deposited in this area over landscape fabric. The City Engineer did review the situation and is <br />recommending that the landscaping fabric remain in place through the winter and spring in order to <br />alleviate any erosion concerns in the spring, w ith a deadline of June 30,2002, for w hen the fabric <br />should be removed and the additional landscaping be installed. <br />W'einberger stated the landscaping plan shows the proposed plantings. Tlte Applicant has planted a <br />spruce tree, and is proposing to plant a maple tree and an apple tree Weinberger stated there are a <br />number of existing trees on this property , which provides canopy. Weinberger stated tlie addition of <br />trees in some areas may not be appropriate given the number of mature trees that already exist in this <br />area. Staff is letommcnding that an additional tree be planted somewhere between the gtass pathway <br />and the stairway toward the lakeshore, which should help to stabilize the bank and provide additional <br />screening to the stairway and retaining ways. The Applicant is also proposing to plant ivy along the <br />retaining walls. Staff recommends approval of the landscape plan subject to the condition that the <br />additional trees be planted. <br />Staff further recommends that the putting green project also be approved. The City Engineer did <br />review this area as well and concluded that the drainage in this area w ill work w ith the rest of the <br />property. <br />Haw n inquired whether Staff was aware that tlie putting green was going to encroach into the bluff <br />setback line at the time the permit was issued. <br />PAGE 6