Laserfiche WebLink
OCT.ll.E001 SiZBPn NO.740 P.E <br />99IWiMhantThdl <br />Mband,MN SSM4 <br />95m734U4 <br />OetiAier 11,2001 <br />Mr. Full Wemberger <br />Zoning AdnuuitntaE/Pknner <br />CilyofOiono <br />CtyiUlBqr.MN 55323 <br />Dev Full: <br />This is tho written follow np to the inessege I left todsy xegaiding the vizunce request ibr 1000 Wildhurst <br />7M1, Request 901«2724. As I stried,Ijosttecetved (he written notice lelated to this lequest Istiongly <br />request that ftiisviriince bo denied. The letsons for niy denial are sbted as such: <br />1. Variance is inconsistent with the required 75 foot set back for ai^ structure firon ftie lake. <br />2. Result Vi an obclnicted view of the lake fcom my property and as a result will lower the value of <br />my property. <br />3. This variance would extend the perceived and real building envelope related to hard cover rules <br />and snay tat piecedest tbat other zeiidents on die hke may encroach upon boundaiiea and possibly <br />ailect natural water filtration of die lake. <br />4. InconsistentofnanagementofvariancepoIiciesbyFlannmgCommissioa <br />Flease respond in writing to this request wdth die opinion of the Flamuog Administrator's assessment and <br />proposed recommendation to die Planning Commisiioa. <br />1 r "•uld request this assessment by yonx department well in advaiue of diis ptopoied meeting so diat I can <br />have appropriate legal counsel st^port our position. <br />Sincerely, <br />Ronald N.Zebeck <br />RNZ/qjb <br />CCi Wendy BBttmhgg, Otnna Plafni-iij <br />Scott Briduon, Lecnaid, Street and Deinaid <br />1 <br />. ifaimMllTimifi rlriiin ~ 11 ~ n WVif^r T ^ ' T iTi«*w iTlr — Tiisseifiii «>ln^iiii ii i i si