Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COM^USSION MEETING <br />_________Monday, October 16,2000_________ <br />t. <br />ROLL <br />The Orono Planning Conunission met on the above date with the following members present: <br />Chair Elizabeth Hawn, Commissioners Jay Nygard, William Stoddard, Dale Lindquist, <br />Janice Berg, and Daniel Kluth. Commissioner Sandra Smith was absent. The following <br />represented City Staff: Senior Plaruiing Coordinator Michael Gaffron, Zoning Administrator <br />Paul Weinberger, Assistant Zoning Administrator Wendy Bottenberg. and Recorder Jackie Young. <br />City Council Representative Barbara Peterson was present. <br />Chair Hawn called the meeting to order at 6:31 p.m. <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS <br />(IH) #2624 ROGER OLSEN, 815 PARTENWOOD ROAD - RENXWAL VARIANCES, <br />6:31 p.m. - 6:37 p.m. <br />Roger Olsen, Applicant, t’.-as present. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Bottenberg stated the Applicants are requesting to rcb iy[^i^tt|g||p|p hat were granted in <br />November, 1997, October, 1998, and October, 1999. would like to e.spand and <br />remodel the existing residence to include a four stall garage and additional living space. <br />Variances were approved by the City Council for lakeshore setback and hardcover in the <br />0*75 ’ zone. Variances were required for remodeling to the e.xisting residence that is located <br />34* from the lakeshore where 73* is required. A hardcover variance in the 0*73* zone s required to <br />allow 13.3 percent where 20 percent exists and zero is allowed <br />Bottenberg stated the lot conforms to lot area, lot w idth, and side yard setback requirements, <br />with the existing residence being located within the required lakeshore setback. The proposed <br />plan reduces the amount of hardcover in the 0>73* setback. <br />City Staff recommends renewing the variances for lakeshore setback and hardcover in the <br />0-73* setback. ■. <br />Olsen stated he has renewed the variances in the past due to financial issues and may not be able <br />to complete the project this year either. Olsen stated be would like to undertake this project in <br />the future, and inquired whether it would be best to let the variances expire or to continue to <br />renew diem. <br />Hawn inquired what would happen if the variances were allowed to lapse. <br />Gaffron stated if the variances lapsed, the Applicant would need to submit a new plan and pay <br />a new fee. GafBon noted the Applicant is only required to pay one-half of the fee if he requests <br />renewal. <br />PAGEl