My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-17-2001 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2001
>
09-17-2001 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 2:32:31 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 2:28:32 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
359
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 28, 1991 <br />(13)NAVARRE HEIGHTS STORM SEWER CONTINUED <br />Mitchell asked. "Would it be safe to say that the water is <br />following its natural drainage pattern at this time?” <br />Cook replied, "Yes, that would be correct." <br />Mitchell said, "I am trying to point out that Minnesota Law <br />entitles water to flow dov/nstream, which is what it is now doing. <br />The City has the authority to put in a pipe wherever they feel it <br />is necessary, but the City cannot assess the cost back to <br />residents that will have no benefit from that project. The water <br />is simply going where it has always gone, and the residents in <br />the area are not obligated to pay for that." <br />There were no additional comments from the public, and Mayor <br />Peterson closed the Public Hearing at 7:15 p.m. <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to abandon this <br />project, based on the fact that the vast majority of residents in <br />the area are opposed to it. Further, there is no public safety <br />risk to warrant the City to mandate the project and assess the <br />residents. Mayor Peterson stated that there has been a <br />significant amount of time and money spent on this issue. She <br />commented that it would have been helpful if all those opposed to <br />the project would have come forward at the very beginning. She <br />thanked the residents for coming forward at this point. Butler <br />stated that given the fact that the majority of residents would <br />appeal the assessment of this project, it would be un\/ise to <br />proceed any further. Jabbour added that Council would not be <br />spending the citizen's tax dollars economically if it chooses to <br />engage legal counsel to assist with the appeal process. All <br />voted aye. Motion passed. <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES: <br />(#4*)MINUTES OF MAY 13, 1991 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve the <br />minutes of the Regular Council Meeting held May 13, 1991. All <br />voted aye. Motion passed. <br />(#5*)MINUTES OF MAY 13, 1991 RE-CONVENED BOARD OF REVIEtl <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve the <br />minutes of the May 13, 1991 Re-convened Board of Review. All <br />voted aye. Motion passed. <br />LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT-JOELLEN HURR <br />LMCD Representative, JoEllen Hurr reported that at the May <br />22, 1991 LMCD Board Meeting, the license request for Lakeside <br />Marina was reviewed and granted. This Marina had been given <br />approval last year to extend its dock out 600 feet. Hurr and <br />Councilmember Jabbour, who attended the meeting, informed the <br />Board that they felt 600 feet was excessive and should not be <br />- 3 -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.