My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-17-2001 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
09-17-2001 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 2:32:31 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 2:28:32 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
359
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING C0M>HSS10N MEETING <br />August 20,2001 <br />3551 Livingston Avenue to the September 17,2001 Planning Commission meeting, due to the <br />absence of the Applicant. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />:W BUSINESS <br />(#^01-2689 MANDEEP SODHl, 4080 DAHL ROAD, AFTER-THE-FACT VARLANCES AND <br />CONDrUONAL USE PERNOT, 7:18 p.m. - 7:53 p.m. <br />Mandeep Sow. Applicant, was present. <br />The CertiFicate oiMailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Weinberger stated the City of Orono became aware in late spring of some vegetation removal and <br />replacement of a stairway ^the lakeshore side of the property located at 1080 Dahl Road. The <br />\\\ <br />property owner had purchased the property the previous year and hired a contractor to replace the <br />\ <br />stairway and retaining walls on the HU|side and to remove the vegetation. The vegetation removal <br />occurred along the stairway leading to thc'l^keshore. Weinberger noted this work was done prior to the <br />\ <br />City issuing a permit approving the work. Staffissued a stop work order and required the property' <br />owner to apply for the proper permits. <br />A <br />\ <br />Orono’s Shoreland Ordinance does not permit “Intensive. Vegetation Removal" within 75 feet of the <br />\\ <br />shoreline, on steep slopes, or within the bluff impact zone. W^berger indicated the area w here the <br />vegetation removal occurred is a protected bluff area, with the sl(^ e.xceeding an average grade of 12 <br />over the length of it. Weinberger stated the area above the stairway consists mostly of an overgrown <br />grassy area, which suffered some damage due to the equipment driving o^r the area. A walkway also <br />existed from the residence down to the previous stairway. <br />Staff, upon discovering removal of the vegetation, reviewed the site and found that a^tortion of the <br />stairway and retaining walls had been replaced. Staff did issue a building permit to allow the property <br />owner to complete the stairway and retaining wall replacement, with the condition the property owner <br />apply for an after-the-fact variance and conditional use permit to permit the retaining wall replacement <br />\ <br />“ PAGE8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.