My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-17-2001 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
09-17-2001 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 2:32:31 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 2:28:32 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
359
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COM>nSSION MEETING <br />August 20,2001 <br />ROLL <br />The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: <br />Chair Elizabeth Hawn, Commissioners Daniel Kluth, Janice Berg, Jeanne Mabusth, Sandra Smith, <br />Dale Lindquist, and Alternate Gary Welsh. Commissioner W'illiam Stoddard was absent. The <br />following represented City Staff: Planning Coordinator Michael Gaffron, Zoning Administrator Wendy <br />Bottenberg, Zoning Administrator Paul Weinberger, and Recorder Jackie Young. City Council <br />Representative Jim White was present. <br />Chair Hawn called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. <br />CONSENT AGENDA <br />(llfl) #01-2702 FINE LINE DESIGN GROUP, 3551 LI\TS'GSTON AVENUE, RENEWAL OF <br />VARIANCES <br />Hawn moved, Smith seconded, to remove Application #01-2702, Fine Line Design Group, from <br />the Consent Agenda. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />Item #1 follows Item #4. <br />OLB3USINESS <br />(#2) #01-2^kJ. ERIC AND CHRISTINE MENGE, 340 TURNHAM ROAD, VARIANCES, <br />6:31 p.m. - 6:48 p.m.\ <br />Craig Johnson, TC Best Homes'J'svas present on behalf of the Applicant. <br />•N. <br />Bottenberg stated this application was tabled at the July 16, 2001 Planning Commission meeting to <br />allow the Applicants time to revise their proposed plan regarding a garage and family room addition. <br />The Applicants have redesigned their plan and have relocated the garage 24 feet from the side lot line <br />and 53.7 feet from the front lot line. The Planning Commission had directed the Applicants that the side <br />setback should be not less than 30 feet. The familv room addition to the rear of the residence remains <br />the same.*• <br />'V <br />Bottenberg indicated a variance to the side yard setback is required to allow the garage to be located . <br />PAGEl <br />c t
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.