My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-17-2001 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2001
>
09-17-2001 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 2:32:31 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 2:28:32 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
359
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 26, 1998 <br />(Af2430 Paul Phillips, Continued) <br />Goetten inoveHn^etefSoa^cconded, to send^AppHcfltIon'^430,2140 Sixth Avenue <br />North, back to the Planninfr€o»iniiM«on^faiM review. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />•(#13) #2431 ROGER OLSEN, 815 PARTENWOOD ROAD-VARUNCE <br />RENEWAL - RESOLUTION NO. 4185 <br />Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to approve Application #2431,815 Partenwood Road, <br />and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4185. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />14(14) #2432 GREENFIELD CORPORATION, 4755/4775 BAYSTDE ROAD <br />EAS^MENT/SUBDIVISION <br />Laurie Lur^en, Greenfield Corporation, and Jim DeBerg, were present. <br />Van Zomeren «a(ed the Applicants are requesting a revision or amendm^t to the final plat <br />resolution to accommodate a private driveway easement over Lot 3 tojirovide access to <br />Lot 1. The private dny^ay easement does not comply with the appf^al resolution for the <br />final plat, which shows ah>putlot for all three lots along Bayside Rpid. Van Zomeren stated <br />Staff is generally not in favdK^f private driveway easements due/o the possible problems that <br />may result <br />The Planning Commission recommend^ denial of a priva^easement and suggested that the <br />Applicant apply for a lot line rearrangement, which woqra require a lot width variance for <br />Lot 3. <br />Jim DeBerg. 1551 Hunter Lane, Medina, stated h^Hiad previously met with the property <br />owner and offered the private driveway easem^non^lizing that it was in conflict with <br />what was originally approved in the Resolution DeBeigi^ted he was later informed by the <br />building official that he could not have a pri^te driveway cement. <br />Laurie Lundeen stated they were unav^e they could not grant a pH^te driveway easement <br />Mayer Jabbour stated the City doeVnot officially recognize a private drivbway easement <br />DeBerg remarked that even wit^he granting of the private driveway easemerit^<lje lot still <br />exceeds the minimum lot size <br />Van Zomeren stated a lot v^dth variance would be needed in the case of a lot line <br />rearrangement for the middle lot.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.