Laserfiche WebLink
T COUNCIL <br />1,1997 <br />• • <br />> •• •*• • <br />:ut of non-structuraJ <br />what currently exists and ‘ <br />lal proposal by removal of <br />ditional structure will <br />tions have been renewed <br />of an application <br />more permanent structure <br />ver is reviewed, the <br />r through the permit <br />lonstruction on the property <br />;ed since the last <br />1 structure. <br />e as existed when the <br />be built originally, <br />t zoning ordinances. <br />)03. Vote: Ayes^.NaysO. <br />fCE- <br />4. Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 0. <br />AVENUE - VARIANCE - <br />CIT Y of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 4004 <br />5. VWc;^Ayes3,NaysO. <br />A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES <br />TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br />SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 AND 2 <br />FILE NO. 2305 <br />WHEREAS, Roger and Elizabeth Olsen (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners <br />of the property located at 815 Partcnwood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter the <br />City") and legally described as follows: <br />Lot 2, Block 2, Partcnwood (hereinafter "the property"); and <br />WHEREAS, the applicant has appUed to the City for v^ances to Mumcip^ <br />Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions I and 2 to aUow the remodelmg and of <br />the existing residence to include a four stall garage and additional livmg space oca e <br />the 929.4 ordinary high water mark where 75' is required and requiring a har cover var^ce <br />of 4,413 s.f. (15.3%) where 5,815 s.f. (20%) is e.xisting and none is allowed as shown o <br />Exhibit A. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. <br />findings <br />This application was reviewed as Zoning File "2305. <br />Hie property is located in the LR-IB Single Family Lakeshore <br />Zoning District requiring one acre in area. The property consists o <br />The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application ori November 17, <br />1997 and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the <br />following findings: <br />1 . The proposed additions would not further encroach on the OHWL. <br />Minnesota: <br />Page 1 of 5