Laserfiche WebLink
SSION <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />WOOD ROAD - <br />orono planning commission <br />MEETINO HELD ON NOVEMBER 17,1997 <br />be met by eliminating several proposed decks and ewstmg patio area on the lake side of <br />tiie residence. By approving this percentage, there would be no net gain in the amount of <br />ha^cover on the property, not including plastic under landscaping. Staff recommends all <br />landscape underlain by plastic in the 0-75’ lalceshore setback be removed prior to <br />commencement of new construction. The applicant has agreed to this provision. Staff <br />also recommends that no further hardcover variances be granted to this property in the <br />future. <br />sing remodeling and <br />; application requires <br />There is no problem <br />The residence <br />ation has been <br />, The allowable <br />istlng foundation will <br />located in the one acre <br />:k is also restricted. <br />^ing a 34' lakeshv <br />:hment on the lakeshore <br />lends hardcover be <br />c where 20% is existing, <br />t amount of existing <br />rhis figure could largely <br />Mr. Olsen, in notmg the difficult lot, said he preferred not to reduce the hardcover further <br />than the proposed 16^ to 14.5%. Ms. Alexander said the total hardcover is less than the <br />25% allowed. <br />Hawn informed the applicant that trading hardcover for landscapbg underlam with <br />plasUc IS not the same and does not justify the additional hardcover. <br />Lmdquist said he agreed noting there is a large amount of structure on the property and is <br />of the opinion that the applicant should maintain the 14.5% hardcover ma.ximum. <br />Stoddard asked Dressier to explain the suggestions for hardcover removal. Alexander <br />noted that as suggested, the hardcover would still be over 14.5%. Dressier informed • <br />McMillan that he arrived at the 14.5% by subtracting the landscaping underlain with <br />plastic from the hardcover. The balance of hardcover to be removed would come from <br />eliminating a portion of the patio, dog run, decking, or decreasing the size of the addition. <br />Olsen said that he would have to eliminate the existing patio or addition even if all of the <br />decking was eliminated. Lindquist informed him that if the residence was new