My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-17-2001 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2001
>
09-17-2001 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 2:32:31 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 2:28:32 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
359
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
VIISSION <br />minutes of the orono plannino commission <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 20,1997 <br />2304. Vote: Ayes 6, <br />ENWOOD ROAD • <br />ed. <br />msloa of an existing <br />ly requiring a lakeshore <br />lote setbacks. A revised <br />figuration, the building <br />pplication subject to <br />of the driveway, plastic <br />ver would be allowed in <br />move the plastic under the <br />jciation covenants <br />lide setback. He would <br />be submitted. Bressler <br />used. The existing <br />alk-out style. Lindquist <br />lire reviewing the plan. <br />[ruction this year. <br />the well. Olsen said he ha^ <br />lination of driveway and <br />percentages and changes <br />(#13 - #2305 Roger and EliTabcth Olsen - Continued) <br />^ indicated he would have to review the plan. Berg said she would like to see ■ <br />what the in^acts are. Schroeder suggested guidance be given to the applicant. Lindquist <br />«ked that the hardcover calculations be improved. Berg noted that the Planning <br />Commission must review the application that will be seen by the Council. <br />Olsen said the shift would change the ftont setback from 35' to 32' and asked if that was a <br />big consideration. He was informed that Lindquist that it was a consideratiotL <br />Schrocdcr (jucslioncd the need for 4 gsiagc stalls. <br />Lmdquist informed the applicant that the City does not like to see any structure within the <br />75' lakeshore setback. <br />I^s. Olsen suggested the plan eliminate the 10' within the setback that is in question by <br />the covenants. Olsen said he could eliminate 10' from the plan but would lose storage <br />space. Lindquist suggested the architectii^ design be considered as well. <br />Schroeder moved, Berg seconded, to table Application #2305. <br />Dr. Bill Cottleman, a next-door neighbor, was present representing the homeowners' <br />association. He submitted a letter form the architectural committee regarding their <br />restrictive covenants. He noted their restrictions are more stringent than those of the City. <br />He smd the homeowners' association would approve the home being more centered on the <br />lot. A copy of the letter was submitted ‘. jtaff. He said the association prefers to se <br />much distance be^vee^ the homes as possible. <br />see as <br />Vote: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />« PETERSON, HAVING AN nOTREST IN 3355 CRYSTAL <br />B.AY ROAD>V4RI^CES - PUBLIC HEA^K<G 11:05-11:10 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publicatioh-ood Certificate^Mailing were noted. <br />The Applicant was present. <br />Photos were shown of the oroperty. <br />Bressler reported that^e applicant is proposing fconstructionbfa282s.f carport with a <br />j o-v* *0 the front of the existing residence. The^iNwde carport woidd <br />extend 22 out over the existing driveway with a walkway. This propos3lS^ require <br />variances for side setback, lakeshore setback, and 0-75’ and 75-250' setbackfedcover. <br />29
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.