My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-20-2001 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2001
>
08-20-2001 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 2:32:08 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 2:25:07 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
324
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMIVUSSION MEETING <br />Monday, July 16,2001 <br />(001-2696 ABC Supply Company, Inc., Continued) <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />Screening shall include an elevated berm with evergreen plantings on and around the <br />berm with the intent to protect the residential properties located west of Old Cry stal <br />Bay Road, a final landscaping plan shall be submitted for review prior to the Council <br />Action. <br />All noise generated by the operation of the business shat, .lot e.\ceed the allowed <br />noise levels as set by the City of Orono Noise Ordinance. <br />Any other conditions as the Planning Commission feels necessary to protect the <br />public safety and health from noise, smoke, toxic or noxious matter, odors, vibration <br />and glare. <br />Jeziorski stated that they realize additional landscaping is required and were looking for Staff and <br />Planning Commission recommendations. <br />Steve White, property owner, stated he was in attendance to answer any questions. There were no <br />other public comments. <br />Lindquist asked if the Applicant had any problems with the staff suggestions. Jeziorski replied that <br />he didn’t but had not seen the plan for the berm prior to the meeting. Lindquist expressed concern <br />that the Applicant had not had sufficient opportunity to review the plans. Jeziorski stated that they <br />had been considering either berming or fencing with privacy slats. <br />Weinberger stated that there was an existing berm created approximately two years ago. The <br />proposed plan would be an e.xpansion of the existing berm. Hawn asked for clarificafion of the ty pe <br />of vegetation to be used on the berm. Weinberger suggested evergreens for year-round protection of <br />the site, but other trees and shrubs could also be considered as part of the plan. <br />Stoddard asked if there had been any input from neighboring pioperties. Weinberger responded that <br />a couple anonymous calls had been received regarding idling truck noise at night. <br />Jeziorski stated that independent truck companies make deliveries. They are requested to give a 24- <br />hour notice but they don’t always do that. Trucks could come at any hour of the night and wait for <br />the business to open. The applicants are willing to post the property but couldn’t post the road or <br />right-of-way. Hawn asked if it was possible for the trucks to park somew here and turn off the <br />engine. Dahl stated there was only one fence with a gate that is locked at night. <br />Hawn stated that the ABC business had the potential problem of idling trucks, and it would be their <br />problem to resolve rather than the City’s. <br />Weinberger stated it was possible that delivery trucks could park off site (truck stops) or in the 100' <br />of driveway that isn’t locked, and a sign could be posted on the gate indicating no idling engines. <br />Jeziorski stated that a truck with a diesel engine would not shut it off. <br />White stated it may be possible to use the Drop Ship parking lot after hours. <br />PAGE 17
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.