08-20-2001 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.56, Subd^' ision 16 (L) (2) - Hardcover shall not exceed 23% in the 73-250' setback 75-250’ Lot .Area = 15,320 s f E.xisting Hardcover 4,435 s.f. (:8.95“/i) Proposed Hardcover » 4,593 s.f. (29.98'Jo) Section 10 55. Subdivision 8 - Ao hardcover ''•’structures are permitted within 73'of the lakeshore Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) - To permit an 8 ’ encroachment into the side yard adjacent to street setback for a new porch proposed to be located off the southeast side of the h.ouse The required side yard setback to C R. 19'Shadnvood Road is 35’ where the porch is proposed 27' from the lot line. Discussion Applicants lot was or.ginally developed in the early 1960s The detached garage was later added in 1975. To meet the needs of the applicants they have proposed an addition to house that vvou.d remodel the e.xisting attached garage to create more living space The existing garage is proposed to be conv^ened into a bedroom and mud exercise room Extending out from the old garage would ^ a new 23' X 28 >’ 2 li car garage. The garage would not increase hardcover because it is being built dnveway. The proposed garage encroaches approximately 5’ into the lakeshore setback. Tire garage was designed to follow the existing house, thus not encroaching any closer to the lakeshore than the house. At the time the house was bui.i ihere was no requirement to meet a 75 setback from the lake. > jocated on the lakeside of the residence had collapsed due to heavy snow this past winter. The deck has not been replaced because a variance is required to teplace the deck. Applicant’s have stated the deck would be a replacement, not an enlargement of the deck that had collapsed The deck IS structure and hardcov er w ithin the 75' setback. Access to the deck would be through sliding doors that enter from the second level of the house. No stairway access to the deck has been pressed A I. X 20 porch and deck are proposed off the southeast side of the house The porch and deck are new construction not replacing any other structure or hardcover. There are several issues with the ^rch and dwk proposal. The porch encroaches 8' into the side yard adjacent to the street setback Code considers the Shadvxvood Road property line as the side propenv line because it is m the snoner of the tw^o dimensions along a street for a corner lot Therefore the property line abutting West Lafayene Road is the front property line. Also the porch and part of the deck contribute 'a increasing the hardcover in the 75-250’ setback. The deck is new structure and hardcov er within 75’ ot the lakeshore. a^chcrt^thS^rciwri^ numbered I) garage, 2) deck, and 3) new porch'deck on the survey'site plan *01-2693 David md .Mar>un< .VUImt 2roo Siudvuood Rtfsd 7/ISOI Pile 2 Of4 1 1