My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-20-2001 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2001
>
08-20-2001 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 2:32:08 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 2:25:07 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
324
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, July 16,2001 <br />(#01-2691 J. Eric and Christine Menge, Continued) <br />that their bedroom would be in close proximity to the proposed garage. Stoddard asked what the <br />distance would be. Berg responded it would be approximately 37'. <br />John Blumentritt and Craig Johnson, architects for the project, presented a computerized <br />demonstration of the proposal. The demonstration presented the location of the existing house and <br />the neighbor’s home, conversion of the existing one-car garage to living space, trees and shrubs on <br />the property, 450 s.f. of additional living space, and a two-car garage addition. <br />Blumentritt explained that he had been working with Menges on a plan that would address the garage <br />addition and proximity to the neighbor. The face of the neighbor’s house is 6' closer to the road than <br />the Menges, with an additional 6* of entryxvay. With the footprint of the existing home at 24' x 24'. <br />they looked at various ways to increase space. By angling the garage, an area was created that would <br />facilitate maintenance equipment in the garage. TItcy also looked at placing the garage so it would <br />face the neighbor to the north. This would have minimized the distance of the garage to the <br />neighbor, but places the driveway along the property line. Slope conditions would also require fill <br />and retaining walls. An angled garage would change the view of the addition for the neighbor to a <br />point of the garage rather than the whole face, minimizing privacy issues. The angled garage also <br />minimizes the amount of driveway and grading required. <br />Blumentritt also commented on the possibility of another bedroom in the basement. He <br />recommended against this idea, noting that a master bedroom addition was being considered for <br />some future time as a second floor. Under the garage, a studio area is planned to be used for <br />hobbies. If the Menges can afl'ord to put a room under the porch, it w ill be a recreation area w ith a <br />pool table. <br />Mabusth asked where the future master bedroom would be. Blumentritt responded that it would be <br />everything to the right of the gable on the entry roof, w hich would be over the main portion of the <br />existing structure. <br />Mabusth commented that the septic capacity was of major concern with the possibility of an <br />additional bedroom. Blumentritt confirmed there would be a second septic site available for a <br />mound sy stem. Hawn questioned the need for primary and alternate septic sites. Weinberger <br />responded that the City asks for two sites, but added that the City will accept a letter from w hoever <br />does the testing to ensure that a potential future site isn’t lost by the addition. <br />Blumentritt noted that if the garage addition were put on the other side of the house, the w alkout <br />lower level would necessitate importing approximately 8' of elevation. In addition, the bedroom <br />windows below would be blocked. <br />Blumentritt reviewed the hardships for the variance application including the fact that a one car <br />garage is not the norm and the difficult site conditions. The proposed design will be able to save <br />some mature trees and buffer the garage doors from neighbor. <br />Berg inquired about the room in the back beneath the deck. Johnson explained that it was proposed <br />and would be included if the budget figures would allow the additional construction. <br />PAGE 4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.