Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, July 16,2001 <br />ROLL <br />The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: <br />Chair Elizabeth Hawn. Commissioners William Stoddard. Dale Lindquist. Sandra Smith. <br />Janice Berg. Jeanne Mabusth. and J. Marc Fritzler (alternate). The following represented City Staff <br />Planning Director Michael Gaffron. Zoning Administrator Paul Weinberger. Zoning Administrator <br />Wendy Bottenberg. and Recorder Lin Vee. <br />Chair Hawn called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. <br />NEW BUSINESS <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS <br />(#1) #01-2690 JOHN A. EIDEN, 330 BIG ISLAND, AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCES, <br />6:31 p.m. - 6:40 p.m. <br />John Eiden. Applicant, was present. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Aflldavit of Publication were noted. <br />Weinberger stated the Applicant is requesting an after-the-fact variance to permit replacement of a <br />lakeside deck on Big Island, constituting hardcover and structural coverage within 75* of the <br />lakeshore. The deck is approximately 32' from the lakeshore. According to historical surveys and <br />photos, the deck appears to be of the same size as the original deck. I he owner's intention was to <br />repair the deck; however, only the original footings could be used because of extensive deterioration. <br />Another issue, unrelated to the variance request, is that a structure located at the rear of the property <br />is above a platted right-of-way used for pedestrian access or utilities. A previous owner had <br />completed a rehabilitation of the structure in 1991 and w as issued a "stop work" order. No further <br />work has been done to that structure and it has no impact on the current variance request. <br />City Stalf recommends approval of the after-the-fact variance request for deck replacement w ithin <br />75' of the lakeshore constituting hardcover and structural coverage based on the fact that the deck <br />previously existed, the existing building was located in its current location prior to current zoning <br />standards, and some ty pe of structure is needed to the lakeside of the building for access. <br />Eiden stated that he had eliminated a staiivvay resulting in less hardcover than the previous deck. He <br />show ed a sample of the rotten floor joists to the Commissioners. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Smith asked if the deck needed to be considered a rebuild rather than a repair. <br />Weinberger responded that since only a couple of posts remained, it was considered new structure. <br />PAGE I <br />j-f