Laserfiche WebLink
July 9,2001 <br />To Orono City Council <br />Input for hearing on Boat Storage Criteria <br />Greetings, <br />We are residents with a lake frontage lot, 600 ’ deep. We have only lived in Orono about <br />1 1/2 years. We purchased land with sufficient space to acconunodate our needs and <br />due to the recent article in the paper found out about some of the storage requirements for <br />boats. Our boat happens to be only 16 feet and is not impacted by most storage <br />requirements. <br />We understand a desire to have pleasing views for passerby’s and for neighbors. That <br />always needs to be balanced with the rights of the landowner to reasonable be able to use <br />and enjoy their property. <br />In looking at the competing factions, we would prioritize the needs of neighbors and <br />landowners over that of passerby’s. The landowners and neighbors are 24-hour-a-day <br />users of the property. Putting this into perspective, passerby’s have very short term <br />(likely seconds) view of the property with no financial investment. Their concerns <br />should not outweigh those who pay for and use the property 24-hours-a-day. <br />Lot sizes also vary widely here. It makes no sense to require a visual barrier for a boat <br />of whatever size if the boat is barely visible to any one but the landowner. Persons <br />living on the lake border each other’s property and e.xpect to see boats. It is <br />unreasonable for passerby’s to expect not to see boats in a lake front area. <br />Our suggestion is that if boats arc stored more then 50 feet off the road and 10 feet otf <br />property lines, there be no requirements for ‘screening’ regardless of size. The screening <br />can be a bigger problem to neighbors then the boat. If a building can be 10 feet off the <br />line, so should a boat. We’d rather look at a boat stored off season then a building there <br />permanently. If a lot is of sufficient size to reasonably maintain it on the property, there <br />should be no reason the landowner cannot keep it on their own property. <br />For smaller lots, using a set back should resolve the problem and those set backs should <br />be no more restrictive then those for buildings. The boat size would be taken care of by <br />set back requirements. If it is too large for the lot size, they will Aot be able to meet set <br />back requirements. <br />How landowners want to cover their boat or not cover it should be their business. What <br />one person likes, another may find offensive - just like the style or color of your home. <br />We should also keep in mind that there are property owners who have been in this <br />community for a long period of time and may not have the fmancial resources to pay for