Laserfiche WebLink
II <br />To: <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Chair 1 lawn and Planning Commission Members <br />Mike GaflVon, Planning Director <br />August 16, 2001 <br />Zoning Amendment: Hxterior Storage (Boats), Section 10.60, Subd. 13 <br />Public Hearing, 8:00 p.m. <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Draft Ordinance Amendment <br />B - Artldavit of Publication <br />C - Memo and Hxhibits of Julv 30 <br />A draft amendment of the exterior storage ordinance related to boat sti>rage is attached. The draft <br />language incorporates Planning Commission's comments from the July 31 work session. This draft <br />was in the Council’s August 13 packet as ‘information only' with a request for comments - none <br />received as of this writing. The draft includes text revisions/additions and a summary table. <br />1 have received no new public comments in reeent weeks. The .August 20 hearing notice was <br />published and posted in the normal manner for code amendment hearings. In addition we sent a <br />news release to the local papers and at least one of them had a notice in the community events <br />section (but listed it incorrectly as Monday August 22). We also requested that the notice he run on <br />Cable Channel 21. I do not have an inkling at this point as to how many people might show up to <br />the hearing. <br />Staff Perspective <br />The building/zoning/planning staff have discussed the draft at length. We have concluded that the <br />draft doesn't make many significant changes from the current code, but it makes screening a higher <br />priority and screening will likely be ver> difficult to accomplish. The existing code allows outside <br />storage of boats over 20' in length as long as they are screened. The draft amendment still requires <br />boats over 20' long to be screened, but establishes standards for screening that w ill be diftlcult to <br />meet. The screening requirement will force residents to become creative, and we can expect to see <br />all sorts of‘contraptions' devised for screening boats. Since fences over 6' high aren't allowed m <br />most places that people will want to store boats, fences aren't a good solution. Vegetative evergreen <br />screening may take some time to grow to a sufficient height, and many lots won't have a site that can <br />be easily screened. Relaxing the screening requirement may help the situation... <br />Enforcing the 10' setback requirement will also be difficult, becau.se we believe there are many <br />situations w here boats have been normally stored nearer the lot line than 10' and meeting the setback <br />at those locations will be impossible. The general expectation that the new ordinance will now be <br />I