07-16-2001 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.36. Subdivision 16 (L) (2) • Hanicover shall not exceed 25% in the 75-250' setback. 75-250’ Lot Area = 15.320 s.f. E.xisting Hardcover = 4,435 s.f. (28.95%) Proposed Hardcover = 4.593 s.f (29.98'?«) 3.Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 - So hardcover or structures are permitted within 75' of the lakeshore. Section 10.24. Subdivision 5 (B) - To permit an 8' encroachment into the side vard adjacent to street setback for a new porch proposed to be located off the southeast side of the hou^e The required side yard setback to C.R. 19'Shadvnvood Road is 35' where the porch is proposed 27* from the lot line. Discussion Applicants lot was originally developed in the early 1960s. The detached garage w as later added in 1975. To meet the needs of the applicants they have proposed an addition to house that would remodel the existing attached garage to create more living space The existing garage is propv>sed to be convened into a bedroom and mud exercise room Extending out from the old garage would be a new 23 ’ X 28.5’ 2 ': car garage. The garage would not increase hardcov er because it is being built over the driveway. The proposed garage encroaches approximately 5’ into the lakeshore setback. The garage was designed to follow the existing house, thus no* encroaching any closer to the lakeshore than the house. At the time the house was built there was no requirement to meet a 75’ setback from the lake. A deck located on the lakeside of the residence had collapsed due to heavy snow this past w inter. The deck has not been replaced because a variance is - equired to replace the deck. Applicant ’s hav e staled Uie deck would be a replacement, not an enlargement of the deck that had collapsed. The deck is structure and hard<:ov er within llie 75’ setback. Access to the deck would be through sliding doors that enter from the second level of the house. No stairway access to the deck has been proposed. A 1 2' X 20’ porch and deck are proposed off Uie southeast side of the house. The porch and deck are new construction not replacing any other structure or hardcover. There are several issues with the porch and deck proposal The pi>rch encroaches 8’ into the side yard adjacent to the street setback. Code considers the Shadyx\ood Road property line as the side property line because it is floi the shorter ot the two dimensions along a street for a comer lot. Therefore the property line abutting \\ est Lafayette Road is the front property line. Also the porch and part of the deck contribute to increasing the hardcover in the 75-250’ setback The deck is new siructun* and hardcover within 75’ of the lakeshore. The three proposals arc numbered I) garage. 2) deck, and 3) new porch ’deck on the surv ey /site plan attached to this report. •010693 Datid and .VIar%*nfK M;uact 2'(X) Slud>v<x>d RaMd 7 IbOl race : of 4 mum