My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-16-2001 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2001
>
07-16-2001 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 2:25:59 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 2:24:49 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
221
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
.MINUTES OF THE OKONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, May 21.2001 <br />(#01-2676 BAYWIND CHRISTIAN CHURCH, CONTINUED) <br />Kluih stated he has not done enough research to determine whether churches would be appropriate in <br />this district. Kluth stated he would like to tabic this application in order to give the members of the <br />Planning Commission and City SufT time to compare the “R** District with the B-4 District to insure <br />that they arc compatible. <br />Grcenley suggested that if it is approx ed tonight, they could simply make it subject to the same <br />requirements as the “R" District. <br />Sttxldard inquired whether the church has a specific lime frame thex xxould like to follow. <br />Heckei staled the church xxould not be a hinderance or an obstacle to the neighborhood. Ileckel stated <br />they are currently liKated at the Excelsior Elementary Scluxil and they are losing families because that <br />is not their target area. Ileckel stated they would like to relocate back to this area as stx^n as they can <br />since a large number of their parishioners come from this area. <br />(Janice Berg leaves at 9:52 p.m.) <br />Smith stated due to one of tlic commissioners leaving, there no longer is a quorum present on the <br />Planning Commission, which means this application must be tabled to the June meeting. <br />It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to table this application. <br />Weinberger suggested the Applicants meet with City Siafl to discuss some of these issues prior to the <br />City Council meeting. <br />Gaffron suggested this application be discussed at the 29"* City Council meeting to see whether llic <br />Council would be willing to hear this application at their June meeting without a formal <br />recommendation from the Planning Commission. <br />Smith noted a City Council member has been in attendance at tonight's meeting, and it will be clearly <br />communicated to the Council why there is not a formal recommendatii>ii on this application <br />PLANM.NG CO.MMLSSIO.N COM.MENTS <br />(#11) REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVES ATTENDING <br />COUNCIL MEETINGS APRIL 23,2001 AND .MAY 14.2001 <br />Max 29 - Stoddard <br />June 11 - Kluth <br />(#12) OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION <br />None <br />PAGE 25
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.