07-16-2001 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MfNltTES OF THF ORONO PLANNINO COMMISSION Monday, May 21,2001 (WOI-2674 DKNNIS AM) DIANE KILI.IAN.CONTINtKD) Boltcnbcrg slated a side yard adjacent» street \ariance is required to permit the roofline to he 13.4 feet rrorn the street where 15 feel is required. Boitenherg noted structural lot coveraue would not increase svith the nxsflinc expansion. City StafT rec»>inmends approval of the application. t.ile had nothing to add to Stall's report. Tlicre were no public comments regarding this application Smith moved, second by Derg, to recommend approval of Application *01-2675, Donna Lite, 2765 Ethel Avenue, granting of a side yard adjacent to street variance to permit the ro4>f line to be IJ.4 fret from the street where a 15 foot setback is required. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (r7) *01.2678 KRISTI ROESI.ER, 1169 ELMWOOD AVENUE, VARIANCES. 7:30-8:03 p.m. Kristi Ri*eslcr. Applicant, was present The Ccnificalc of Mailing and AlTidavit of Publication were noted nottenberg stated this is n two-part application. Tlie Applicant owns two properties UKated at 1169 North Arm Drive, which is an oO thc lake parcel with a residence, and Lot 7. HliKk I of Sharp and Lindquist's Geniliill. I Jike Minnetonka” addition, which is a vacant lot consisting of 50 feet oflakcshorc. liottenberg stated the two parcels have not been legally combined and arc separated by the Elmwinxl Avenue right-of-way and are offset by approximately 100 feet The Applicant purchased the properties approximately two years ago and has since learned that a d<Kk is not allowed on the lake lot because tiKre is not a principal structure on the lot. Bottenberg stated the first pan of the application is to rev iew variances b^r lot arca'widlh regarding the lake lot to permit future residential construction. The lot is approximately I l.lOO square feel or .255 acres where the minimum lot area requirement is one acre, and approximately 50 feet wide where 140 feet is the minimum lot width required for the I R-IB zoning district. Pan two of the application is a request for a v ariance to permit a lot combination of a propeny not adjacent to the building lot for lake'dock use Ihe two propenies are separated by blmvviHxl Avenue The Applicant is requesting the ability to have lake access'dvwk via Lot 7. which is not combined with 1169 Nonh Arm Drive The lot does not hav ' •« principal structure. Bottenberg indicated a structure could be constructed on the propeny through a special lot combination agreement, which would function as a covenant requiring the two parcels remain in common ownership. The Applicant is requesting a variance to allow the two lots to be combined and a variance to accessory buildings at time of construction PAGE 10