Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Moaday, May 21.2001 <br />ROLL <br />The Oruno Planning Cominissiun met on ihe above dale with the following memlKrs present: <br />Acting Chair Sandra Smith, Commissioners Janice Berg. William Stoddard, and Daniel Klulh. <br />Commissioners Jeanne Mahiisth, nii/abeth Hawn, and Date Lindquist were absent. The following <br />represented City Staff: Planning Director Michael Gaffron, Zoning Administrator Paul Weinberger. <br />Zoning Administrator Wendy Uottenberg. and Recorder Jackie Young. City Council Representative <br />Jay Nygard was present. <br />Acting Chair Smith called the meeting to order at 6;36 p.m. <br />OLD BUSINESS <br />(«l) »2W6 <;ARY AND SUS.VN CABLE. 3532 IVY PL.\CE, % ARIANCES. <br />6:37 p.m. - 7:04 p.m. <br />Gary and Susan Cable. Applicants, were present <br />Weinberger stated this application was rev iewed and tabled at Ihe November 20.2000 Planning <br />Commission meeting, fhe Applicants are requesting a variance to the requirement that an accessvsry <br />building can remain on the property without a principal building. 1 he accessory building in this case <br />is an ice house kK'aicd near the lakeshore. A variance is also required to allow hardcover in excess of <br />Ihe 25 percent limit in the 75*250' setback. <br />WcinlK*rger staled the principal building was a*inoved to allow construction of a new house. The <br />property owners were issued a building permit with the understanding they wtuild agree to uphold the <br />decision by the City regarding the future use of the ice house. A Temporary Ccrtiricate of Occupancy <br />was approved on April 10, 2001 . A condition of approval was the ice house must bt removed or gel <br />City approval, by variance, to allow the ice house to remain on the property within O') days of Ihe <br />Tempi>rary Certificate of Occup:incy »>r a final Certificate of Occupancy could not be issued and the <br />house not occupied <br />Weinberger staled Ihe permtiied hardcover m the 75*250' setback is 25 percent of the area, with Ihe <br />hardcover in the 0-75' setback being deducted from what is allowed in the 75-250' setback. lire <br />Applicants have proposed a driveway apron that would only provide access to two garage doors and <br />would not prov ide access for the third stall. That arrangement eliminated the need for a variance that <br />they had requested in the pas'.. The City then issued the building permit to the Applicants because <br />they were under the 25 percent hardcover limit. Weinberger staled when Ihe 96 square feet of <br />structural cov erage for the ice house is included in Ihe hardcover calculations, they are in excess of the <br />25 percent allowed by 50 square feet. <br />The Planning Commission at its November. 2000 meeting had requested that if the Applicants choose <br />to keep Ihe ice house on the property , they would need to appear before the Planning Commission, <br />with Ihe adv ice that the City docs not approve replacement of foundations fur structures located within <br />Ihe 0-75* setback. Tlic Applicants were also advised that if they wished to increase the amount of <br />hardcover on the properly, they would need to remove the ice house. 1lie decision on how to use the <br />25 percent hardcov er was leR up to the discretion of the Applicants following the Nov ember meeting. <br />PAGE 1