My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-18-2001 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
06-18-2001 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 2:25:32 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 2:24:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Dale: June 6.2001 <br />Hem No.: ^ <br />Department Approval: <br />Kame: Michael P. GafTron <br />Title: Planning Director <br />Adminiilrator Approval:Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Detcriplion: *^01-2676 Baywind Chrisiian Church - Proposed Zoning Code Amendment: <br />Add “Churches*' to l ist of B-4 Conditional Uses <br />Atlachmcnta <br />A - Draft Planning Commission Minutes May 21.2001 <br />B - Planning Commission Comments Compilation <br />C - Additional SialTComments re; Church Use in B*4 <br />D - Staf!' Memo & Fxhibits of 5/1 6/0 1 <br />E-Staff Memo of 5/24/01 <br />On May 29. Council agreed to consider the Baywind application on June 11 absent further Planning <br />Commission re\ iew. directing staft'to pi>ll the Commission and compile the individual comments. <br />Individual Planning Conunission comments are included in Exhibit B. <br />Stall's May 1 6 memo (Exhibit D) is still applicable for Council's rcN iew. Additional stalTcomments <br />responding to some of liic issues raised by Planning Commissioners ore included in Exhibit C in a <br />Question/Answer format. <br />Hearing Process <br />The Planning Commission did not fomullx close the public hearing on May 21; the Council's <br />review should include an opportunity for public comments. The hearing notice has not K*en re <br />published. However, staff believes that the members of the public present on May 21 were advised <br />of the request for and potential for review by Council on June II, hence we do not believe the <br />hearing process is Hawed. You may wish to ask the City Attorney for his opinion. <br />Performance Standards <br />If “Churches" is added to the list of allowed conditional uses in the B-4 /one. it would be appropriate <br />to consider what specific performance standards should be required to obtain that use in order to <br />minimize any negatix e impacts that might accompany that use. An option would be to send this back <br />to Planning Commission for further study of performance standards if Council chooses to <br />conceptually approve adding the use to B-4.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.