My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-18-2001 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2001
>
06-18-2001 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 2:25:32 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 2:24:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Mowlay.May2l,200l <br />(W6J6 CARY AND SUSAN CABLE. CONTINUED) <br />Smith noted the Applicants ore 38 square feet over with the ice house, but lack a sidewalk to the front <br />of the house and driveway access to the third stall of the garage. Smith inquired whether they would <br />like to table it or have the Planning Commissitm vote on the motion that has been made denv ing the <br />application. <br />Cable indicated he would like the Planning Commission to vole on the application. <br />Smith seconded the above motion. <br />VOTE ON THE ABOVE MOTION; Ayes 4. Nay s 0. <br />(W2) ttOI-2668 MANLEY BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, 1973 FAGERNESS POINT ROAD. <br />VARIANCES, 7:05 p.m. - 7; IS p.ni. <br />Curt Manley. Applicant, was present. <br />Weinberger stated this is a three-part application, with t' : Applicants requesting an aOer-the-fact <br />conditional use permit and variances to permit construction of two retaining walls within 75 feet of the <br />lakcshore. a variance to permit two domicr window additions within 75 feet of the lakeshore and <br />within the average lakeshore setback, and a request to replace a deck and three fiHM hand railing <br />around a dct.u'hcd garage <br />Weinberger stated the retaining walls were constructed approxinia .’ly one year ago to help slabili/c <br />the lakeside of the residence and to improve the walkout area. WcinlK'rger staled the City is unable to <br />v erify that there retaining walls in that area prev ious to the construction of the new ones Weinberger <br />stated it is pcwsible sv>me very low level boulder walls may have e.xisted in this area which were <br />completely covered by vegetation and do not appear in llie City’s photographs. A previ ms variance <br />application in 1998. which included a survey, did not depict retaining walls in that portion of the <br />property. The City also does not have any documentation showing when the original retaining walls <br />were constructed. <br />The second part of the application is a request to allow the construction of two dormer window <br />additions within 75 feet of the lakeshore and within the average lakeshore setback. A variance is <br />required because the dormer windows would be an expansion of the building within a required <br />setback. Tlie dormers would be an expansion of the building envelope within 75 feet of the lake and <br />an expansion of the building envelope within the average setback to the two adjacent residences <br />I he third part of the request is to permit replacement of the deck and a three-foot hand railing that is <br />liKaied on top of the detached garage. Weinberger indicated there was an original deck located on the <br />garage depicted in a photograph taken in 1998. along w ith a hand railing. Tbe original deck was <br />remov ed from the lop of the garage so the roof could be replaced. The Applicant is proposing to <br />replace the deck and railing in a similar style to what had been there previously. <br />Weinberger recommended the Planning Commission consider the retaining walls separate from the <br />other requests. <br />PAGE 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.