Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OFTIIE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Mowlay. May 21,2001 <br />(02636 GARY AND SUSAN CABLE, CONTINUED) <br />Smith inquired whether the Applicants would be w illing to consider the addition of those two items. <br />Cable indicated the construction of the house is completed. Cable stated they reduced the hardcover <br />down to what they were allowed at the time they built Ute house. <br />Berg indicated the need for a sidewalk and paved access to the third stall was discussed at the <br />November Planning Commission meeting. Berg stated in her view a sidewalk and paved access will <br />eventually be added on this property, which will bring the total hardcover on the property over the <br />allowable 25 percent. <br />Kluth inquired whether the City's Ordinances require a front sidewalk and paved access to all garage <br />stalls. <br />Weinberger stated there presently are not Code requirements pertaining to that. <br />Kluth noted the City did issue a building permit up to the maximum hardcover amount without <br />allowing for a sidewalk and additional driveway to the third stall. <br />Weinberger stated that issue had been discussed at Uic time the Applicants applied for the building <br />pemiit, but since this site plan did meet all the requirements of the City, the building permit was <br />issued. <br />Gaffron stated in quite a number of instances Applicants will approach the Cit> with site plans that arc <br />in excess of the allowable hardcover, with Staff working with the Applicants in order to reduce the <br />amount of hardcover and structural coverage being proposed on the property. Gaffron stated Staff did <br />question the lack of a sidewalk and lack of access to the third stall of the garage at the time they <br />applied for the building permit. Gaffron stated the Applicants would be able to place a wood chip <br />sidewalk to the house if they so choose. <br />Stoddard stated it is his understanding of the November Planning Commission meeting that they were <br />debating whether the ice house should remain. Stoddard stated since this application did not reappear <br />before the Planning Commission, he had assumed the Applicants had taken steps to address the issue <br />of the sidewalk and access to the garage. <br />Cable stated at the time they appeared before the Planning Commission, the building permit had <br />already been issued. <br />Stoddard stated the function of the Planning Commission is to help insure Uiat the site plans are in <br />compliance with the City's ordinances. Stoddard stated in his view the sidewalk and access to the <br />third stall will be added in the future. Stoddard inquired whether the Applicants would be able to <br />reduce hardcover somehow and provide for a sidewalk to the front door. <br />Weinberger stated currently the hardcover in the 75-250' setback is under the allowable 25 percent <br />limit by 46 square feet w ithout the ice house. Weinberger stated the Applicants could provide a paver <br />stone system for a front sidewalk rather than a full sidewalk. <br />PAGE 3