Laserfiche WebLink
^ L <br />Application Date: <br />60 Day Deadline: <br />10/17/M <br />12/16/00 <br />TO: Chair I lawn and Orono Planning Cennmission Members <br />Ron Moorsc, City Administrator <br />FROM: Paul Weinberger, Zoning Ad>n.nistrator/PIanncr <br />I)ATF: November 13.2000 <br />SUDIKCT: «2636 Gary and Susan Cable <br />3532 Ivy Place <br />Variances - Public Hearing <br />Zoning Distriet: <br />Application: <br />I) <br />LK-IC One Family laikeshore Residential District (1/2 acre) <br />Request fur a variance to permit an accessory' building to remain on a property following <br />removal of the principal structure. <br />Variances to permit future structural maintenance to a non-conforming structure and to <br />permit 3,346 s.f of hardcover on the property where 3.2% s.f is allowed. <br />Pertinent Code Sections: <br />1 Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2 limits the location of structures and hardcover within <br />75' of the lakeshore. <br />2. Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 limits the hardcover allowed on a property. <br />3. Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 limits accessory buildings to being constnicted on lots only <br />after construction of the principal building. The City of Orono has required accessory <br />buildings to be removed when principal buildings arc removed. (A permit was issued by the <br />City of Orono to demo the principal dwelling on the property on 9/7/00 - The building has <br />since been removed for construction of a new residence) <br />Building Permit: <br />The application received on 10/24/00 requested variances to allow hardcover in c.xcess of 25% for <br />the new house and driveway. Revised plans were received from the contractor on 11 /13/00 that have <br />reduced the liardcovcr in the 75-250' setback to under 25"/o (3,250 s.f.). The contractor has requested <br />a building permit for construction of the house not requiring any variances. As noted in the <br />follow ing paragraphs, the methods for reducing the hardcoN er leave questions regarding the viability <br />of die proposal, since needed sidewalks arc elimiiuted and driveway apron reduced to a questionable <br />layouL <br />•2M G m) Md Suud CiM« <br />35321%> PItce <br />Vvunccs - PuMk IkJtint <br />PV I