My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-21-2001 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
05-21-2001 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 2:25:27 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 2:24:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, November 20,2000 <br />(M2636 GARY AND SUSAN CABLE, Continued) <br />Stoddard stated the Planning Commission tends to limit structural coverage on new construction <br />to 15 percent and 25 percent hardcover. <br />Ha\Mi concurred that the 15 percent structural coverage will need to be adhered t-1. Hawn stated <br />the Cit>- iNpically does not allow any Uardcover within the 0-75’ aone, noting the i ^ has <br />ordinances in place which permits replacement of those structures only under certain <br />circumstances. <br />Hawn commented she personally is unsure about what plan is being presented to the Planning <br />Conrmission tonight, noting the Planning Commission is not here to design the Applicant’s house <br />and driveway. Hawn stated she would like to know exactly what hardcover the Planmng <br />Commission is being asked to consider. Hawn stated if the ice house remains, the third staU of <br />the garage and driveway will probably not be approved. <br />Berg inquired whether there w ill be a front sidessalk between the front entry and the driveway <br />Weinberger stated the Applicants are proposing a sidewalk. Weinberger stoted the building <br />permit does not show a sidewalk. <br />Smith inquired whether the sidewalk is included in the 100 additional square feet of hardcover. <br />Weinberger stated that is included in the 100 square feet. Weinberger stated the 50 feet of excess <br />hardcover does include the ice house. <br />Smith commented it is her opinion if the Applicants w ish to keep the ice house, they may do so, <br />but that they will need to come back before the Planning Commission at the time the foundation <br />of the ice house is proposed to be replaced Smith stated tspically the City docs not approve <br />leplacemcnt of foundations for stmcturcs located within the 0-75’ 7onr <br />Lindquist commented in his view the ice house should be removed if the Applicants want <br />the additional hardcover. <br />Smith stated the decision to keep the ice house is up to the Applicants. <br />Lindquist stated if the ice house remains, the amount of hardcover should be limited to 25 <br />percent <br />Smith stated she would be in agreement with the 25 percent lurdcover limit. <br />Hawm inquired w hether they need to look at »op of the bluff requirements, noting there is a steep <br />dropoff. <br />Weinberger stated there is no bluff situation on this property. <br />Lindquist inquired how many square feet they are over on the hardcover. <br />PAGES
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.