My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-16-2001 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2001
>
04-16-2001 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 2:25:00 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 2:24:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITYof ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />MO. 8 8 8 9 _ <br />is only 24* in width as proposed. The adjacent house on the properly to <br />the northeast averages 18' from the lot line, hence the separation between <br />the structures will be maintained at appro.ximately 26*, greater scparalion <br />than might be obtained if all houses in the neighborhood were <br />constructed right up to the required 10* side setbacks. <br />O.WTtile the lot at 8,550 s.f. and width of 46-50 ’ is relatively small <br />compared to the I acre/140' standards of the LR-ID zone, other <br />developed lots in the neighborhood arc of similar size. Further, the <br />property has contained a single family residence for many years and has <br />remained in single separate ownership. <br />Applicant has provided a grading and drainage plan which will <br />adequately manage the runoff from the property. Because the <br />neighboring property to the east has recently been reconstructed, the <br />opportunity c.\ists for an appropriate drainageway to be developed along <br />the common lot line. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br />by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety <br />and welfare of the community. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions cxist'mg on this property are peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br />granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not iricrcly <br />serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to prcscr\e a substantial <br />property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />Page 3 of 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.