My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-19-2001 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
03-19-2001 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 2:24:29 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 2:23:54 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />OKONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />February 21.2001 <br />somewhat. Gaflron stated the Applicants arc also proposing to remove some landscape p!a:>tic and <br />rock as part of tlus project. OalTron stated the amount of hardcover resulting from the turnaround <br />would probably be between SO to 100 square feet. <br />Hawn suggested that perhaps by moving the garage forward somewhaL the amount of driveway <br />could be reduced slightly. <br />Gaffron stated moving the garage forward would possibly result in a reduction of 50 to 100 square <br />feet of hardcover. <br />Klutli indicated he would be like to sec a revised plan sliowing tltc proposed changes prior to voting <br />on this application. <br />GafTron stated the Planning Commission could review the revised plan at their March meetiiig. <br />Hcdblom stated they would like to go before the City Council at their March meeting if possible. <br />Hawn coiiuncntcd the Applicants will need to submit a revised plan depicting the smaller sized <br />garage in its new location with a turnaround added so the Planning Commission will know exactly <br />the amount of hardcover and structural coverage being proposed. Hawn commented for safety <br />reasons she would be in support of some improvements being done to the garage and driveway <br />situation I lawn indicated the Applicants w ill need to limit structural coverage to the amount <br />currently existing, which is 17 percent. <br />Kluth stated he is opposed to tlie plan being presented tonight since it exceeds the existing <br />structural coverage. <br />Gaffron noted the Applicants would be required to extend the review period for this application <br />since the 120 days expire the 16*“ of March. Gaffron stated tlic City has a standard form tlut tlic <br />Applicants will need to sign extending the review period <br />Hawn moved. Kluth seconded, to table Application M2644, Gary and Joan Marquardt, <br />2617 Casco Point Road, to allow the Applicants time to submit a revised plan. <br />PAGES
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.