03-19-2001 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Pcrlliicnt C<nle Svclioin 1.Section 10.22, SuWivislon 2 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (2): To permit an alteration to c.xisling luirdeover over the allowed 25%. Lot Area 75-250^ Allowed Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed 1 lardcovcr 12,727 s.f. 3,181 s.f. (2.**%) 3,710 s.f. (29% of which 220 sf or 1.7% is rock/ptoslic) “ (27.3%) 4,902 s.f. (38%) (rock/plastic removed) Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C): To permit greater than 15% lot coverage by structures. Lot Area Allowed Coverage Existing Coverage Proposed Coverage 17,467 s.f. 2,620 s.f. (15%) 2,970 s.f. (17%) 3.237 s.f. f 18.5%) 267 s.f. increase In lot coverage 3. Section 10.25, Subdi\ ision 6 (H): To permit an encroachment into the .side setback 2.85* from, llie side property line for conslructitm ofa 30* X 30’ attached garage, where a 10* side setback is required and to permit the garage addition 21.76* from the front property line where a 30* selluck is reijuiied. 4. Section 10.25, Subdiv ision 6 (B): 'l o permit an encroachment into the side setback 2.64' from the side property line to permit the addition ofa second story above the existing residence within the required 10* side setback Required SctlTncks I.R-IC I^ont Yard = 30* Side Yard '= 10* Discussion: Applicants have addressed the issue of egress and ingress to the property with the existing garage location. The existing garage is located only 18* from Casco Point Road and faces the road creating a potentially hazardous situation with vehicles backing out to the road without tire ability to view on coming vehicles and pedestrians. Several obstacles including a neighboring fence, tree and telephone pole block much of the view to the sucet. 1 he attached garage allow s the \ chicles to back out into the yard and approach the street at an angle improving views to the street as well us allowing vehicles traveling on Casco Point Road to more easily view entering vehicles from the applicant’s property. In the applicant’s letter of request they have stated there have been dozens of brake screeching ne.ir misses while backing out. *rhe concent is the location of the proposed attached garage that w ould be located only 2.85* from the side lot line where a 10* setback is required. Construction of the house was before the adoption of the current zoning standards. The site plan shows the Ioc.ation of the house in relation to the property line. The garage would not encroach any closer to the side property line than the house. •2M4 Gary anJ loan Maaquaidl 2617 C bko Point Roai) Vafiaace* -PuMicMcanag Page 2 of S