My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-17-2001 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
01-17-2001 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 2:31:49 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 2:22:08 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
496
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, November 20, 2000 <br />(H26W2641 ORONO AMBAR. Conlimied) <br />with the adjoining residential area. <br />Dunbar stated as it relates to the senior housing facility, they have reduced the number of <br />outdoor parking stalls to 50 and arc considering the possibilitx of increasing the indoor parking <br />to 84 spaces Dunbar noted they arc looking at Staffs concerns and arc attempting to address <br />those. Dunbar stated they could also remove the tower incorporated into the senior housing <br />facility. <br />Dunbar indicated they will need to discuss with ilic City Council any financing tliat could be <br />made a^-aibblc on this project Dunbar noted a non-profit organization would own this facility <br />once constructed, with the mission of the non-profit to provide moderately priced senior <br />housing, which is somewhat dependent on the amount of financing provided by the City. <br />Evelyn Schommer. 2106 Sugan\ooil Dn\e. inquired whether any fajuily members would be <br />able to reside with the senior residents <br />Dunbar slated under state law they are not permitted to have family members live in the senior <br />housing facility unless tlicy arc married <br />Schommer inquired whether there would be balconies on the building and what they would be <br />used for. <br />Dunbar staled lhc\ arc planning balconies on the facility, which will be used for sitting. Dunbar <br />indicated there will be no electrical outlets located on tlic outside of the building for the decks <br />A resident in the audience inquired about tlic lighting and air<onditioning of the building. <br />Dunbar stated there will be air-condilioning units axailabic in each individual unit <br />-* GafTron noted the City will require recessed outdoor lighting <br />Dunbar stated thex need to construct a 70 unit facility in order to help keep the rent Increases <br />to a minimum <br />Karl Berg. 2112, Sugarwood Drive, commented he lias a number of issues he xxould like to <br />see addressed Berg stated he would like to see the serv ice road pass in front of the prot>erty <br />Berg inquired about the height of the building and lighting at night Berg commented in his view <br />the senior housing dexclopmcnt would make a good neighbor, with the coneept plan being more <br />positive than negative <br />GafTron indicated the City could incorporate a height restriction for this zoning district if they <br />should elect to do so. <br />Schommer commented the neighbors wwld like to be kept updated on the progress of this <br />project. <br />PAGE 27 <br />N <br />H <br />I <br />u
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.