My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-17-2001 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2001
>
01-17-2001 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 2:31:49 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 2:22:08 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
496
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
have restricted any gamgo construction to the area where the existing garage stands. One outdoor <br />parking space is currently located north of the existing garage. This space is partially off the property <br />into the right of way. The space may also encroach slightly onto an adjacent property. The outdoor <br />space would be eliminated if a new two stalled structure is built. <br />The building would be a two level building with the lowest level access being located towards the <br />house below the hillside. The purpose of the lowest level is to provide indoor storage on the <br />propeny. A small shed would be required to be removed to accommodate a larger building resulting <br />in a loss of storage on the property. <br />Hardcover: <br />The property would not e.xcced the allowed hardcover in the 75-250* lakeshore setback. The <br />tt lal hardcover would be appro.ximalely 1,850 s.f. (21®o). <br />Existing <br />Total Hardcover 75-250 ’ setback " 1,699 s.f. (20%) <br />Setbacks: <br />The 5 ’ proposed front yard setback would allow for off street parking in the driveway. Long Lake <br />Boulevard is a narrow street that docs not provide on street parking. The code requires a 30' setback <br />for garages when the doors face the property line. The building is required to have a 10’ setback to <br />property lines when no access is required. Long Lake Boulevard is not a through street and does not <br />carry hea\y traffic, mostly local traffic. There is no proposed change to the access to the property. <br />The 5 ’ side yard setback would allow another building on the adjacent properly to be located 5 ’ from <br />the lot line and maintain a 10’ building separation as required by the State Uuildtng/Fire Codes. <br />Review of Hardship: <br />1.The site topography restricts a garage to only the northeast comer of the property. The <br />properties along Long Lake Boulevard slope to home building sites, 'fhe garages must be <br />located at the lop of the hill to avoid unsafe drivev\ay access to the properties This particular <br />lot is unique by the fact the only high point is to one side. The northwest comer of the <br />property slopes ofTmuch closer to the road not leaving adequate room for a building. <br />A well is located between the house and garage. State Code requites a building, or any <br />portion of a building, to be located no closer than 3 ’ to a well. A minimum two stall garage <br />would fit into the hillside without •equiring the well to be relocated. <br />A building below the hill would have driveway slopes up to 15% which is for greater than <br />what the City suggests for safe access. The garage entrance would only be about 1* lower <br />than Long Lake Boulevard. The lower level storage area w*ould minimize the need for <br />additional storage buildings on the propert)’. <br />«2649C; tftci Lccll«> <br />152S Long Lake Boutetard <br />Vana.'!^ <br />PifcZ
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.